Get help now

Government Funding for the Arts Essay

  • Pages 3
  • Words 703
  • Views 275
  • Download

    Cite

    Kip
    Verified writer
    Rating
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • 5/5
    Delivery result 2 hours
    Customers reviews 234
    Hire Writer
    +123 relevant experts are online

    Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get help now

    124 experts online

    The National Endowment for the Arts is a government sponsored foundation. The duty of the National Endowment for the Arts is to foster the growth of the arts evenly through the national, state, and local levels of the country. With all of the budget slashing that is now taking place the arts is the first place that people look to take money from. This not only happens on the national level but also in our schools. Many people don’t see the arts as important. It is the most important thing that our society has. Art, in each and every form that it comes in, shows us who we are.

    Our ictures that we paint, our songs which we compose, our theater for which we write, act, and dance for, our buildings which we design, as a whole, explains our culture. Future historians will look back at these things and judge us by our accomplishments in these areas. When we look back in history, we recall it through the greatest past achievements in art: the Sistine Chapel, the great pyramids of Egypt, Tchaikovsky’s 1812 Overture, and the works of Plato. Shouldn’t we be able to show feats just as grand? Most Americans do agree with me.

    In 1992, a study called the “Americans nd the Arts VI” was conducted; it ended with these results: * 60% of the people support the federal support of the arts. * 63% of the people support the state’s support of the arts. * 84% of the people regard art as a reflection of life and times of a nation. * 75% of the people think that the government can be helpful to artists in funding their work and in helping them gain recognition. * 69% of the people would raise their taxes $5 a year if it were to go to the arts. * 64% a $10 increase and 56% a $15 increase. * 90% of the people feel that the arts should be a regular part of a child’s education. 4% of the people would cut spending on school sports programs before the arts programs (Philp 5).

    Another survey shows that 73% of the population would favor arts support even during a recession (O’Steen 229). In 1965, when the National Endowment for the Arts was brought into being, President Lyndon B. Johnson said, “Art is a nation’s most precious heritage. For it is in our works of art that we reveal to ourselves and to others the inner vision which guides us as a nation. And where there is no vision, the people perish” (Philp 5). The National Endowment for the Arts, returns its oney from the people, back to the people.

    Many of the organizations and people supported by govern-ment grants might otherwise be bankrupt and out on the streets. The government’s arts endowments to the NEA in 1995 was a measly $167 million and was barely helped by the $56. 4 increase to all arts foundations (Grimes C19). With a still majority of Republicans in Congress, the outlook of the NEA and other nationally funded arts agencies is bleak. The House Budget Committee is chaired by John Kasich (R-Ohio) who co-authored the Penny-Kasich Amendment which calls for a ten percent cut in support for the NEA, the National

    Endowments for the Humanities, the Institute for Museum Services, the Smithsonian Institute, the National Gallery of Art, and the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (Janowitz 56). Dick Armey (R-Tex), the National House Speaker, says, “My own view of the matter is [that] the NEA offends the Constitution of the United States. My own view is [that] there is no constitutional authority for this agency to exist” (Janowitz 56). The only hope is with President Bill Clinton (D-Ark). Mr. Clinton calls for small increases in some of the arts foundations. He also assigned three goals to the

    President’s Committee on the Arts and Humanities, which he revived: * to increase public understanding of the arts and the humanities and build grassroots support for them; * to identify new sources of funds, especially from individuals, foundations, and corporations; and * to use public meetings and publications to address urgent issues in the nation’s cultural life (Brademas 804). The NEA and other government sponsored foundations are essential organs to the life of us as a society, nation, culture, and civilization. With the destruction of these agencies, the government is destroying our ability to show our inner vision.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need custom essay sample written special for your assignment?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Government Funding for the Arts Essay. (2018, Sep 04). Retrieved from https://artscolumbia.org/government-funding-for-the-arts-57667/

    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper