Get help now
  • Pages 3
  • Words 601
  • Views 312
  • Download


    Verified writer
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • 4.7/5
    Delivery result 3 hours
    Customers reviews 346
    Hire Writer
    +123 relevant experts are online

    Brief comparison of Andy Warhol and Jackson Pollock Essay

    Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get help now

    124 experts online

    Jackson Pollock was an Abstract Expressionist who used the Action painting Tyler, as opposed to the Color Field Painting sibyl. He was active in the sass and 1 9505, joining a wealth of artists moving to the newly established art capital of the world. Pollock’s art practice consisted of lots of physical exertion; gesturer movements of the wrist, elbow and shoulder that created a rhythmic sense of pattern. As is evident in his most famous work Blue Poles (1952).

    To create a massive work like Blue Poles his method included laying the large canvas on the floor, stretching it out, and pinning it down. He was then able to move around all four sides of he canvas. Using this method he felt importantly more ‘apart’ Of his work, thus facilitating the intentionally expressive and highly personal purpose of the work. Pollock didn’t use a brush, instead he used foreign implements (sticks, syringes, trowels) and added foreign materials (such as nails, broken glass and sand).

    Pollock preferred to use a stick to best exploit the ‘drip’ technique or effect he wanted to create. This collection of abstract tools added to his intensely expressive practice. The artworks he created were unique but so personal that the audience were detached and the meaning to the works were seemingly unrecognizable. The public mostly reacted with distaste, hence Pollock’s artworks were largely unpopular amongst the general public. Pollock’s deeply expressive work contrasts greatly with the body of work of Andy Warhol.

    Whorl’s artworks were mostly produced using the silk-screen printing. He employed several assistants to help him create his numerous works at the pace he desired. Thus originality is questionable in Whorl’s works works, where the process was, in its machine-like and impersonal manner, reflecting the mass- reduction of the consumer world. The process is vital and a personal journey for Pollock, yet for Warhol it was just seemingly a chore required to create the end product. He changed the accepted view of what an art work should be.

    Whorl’s works generally consisted of flat areas of color, very little tone or texture and bold outlines and bright colors. Pollock’s works were composed Of an abundance of texture which reflects the great difference to Warhol and his flat images. The subject matter of Whorl’s works were generally a consumer product, even he face of a celebrity was reproduced like another mass-produced image, thus these subjects that were so common in pop culture (such as Green Coca- Cola Bottles;1962 and Campbell Soup Can;1961-62) provided images readily identifiable to the audience.

    Hence Pop Art and its artists were popular due to this familiarity and Andy Warhol himself achieved the level of stardom he often portrayed in some of his works(such as Marilyn, 1964). Such familiarity meant that these works by Warhol were tangible. The public could understand them, or at least admire their basic aesthetic value. The motional intangibility of Pollock’s works contrast greatly with Whorl’s works. The public could also enjoy the rumor behind the works, like Brills Soap Box (1970). The two artists were almost completely divergent to each other.

    However it must be noted that they both used art to portray something With a personal connection; as Warhol was a huge fan of celebrities and that was one of his main subjects. Warhol was a reaction against Pollock. Where Pollock’s work was firmly embedded in the subjective frame and the structural frame. Whorl’s works were usually in the guttural frame and the structural frame. Pollock’s works refer to him and his emotion, whereas Whorl’s works refer to the complete opposite the main-stream in an emotionless and apathetic way.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need custom essay sample written special for your assignment?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Brief comparison of Andy Warhol and Jackson Pollock Essay. (2018, May 26). Retrieved from

    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper