This becomes obvious when nee reads a poem by a chosen poet, as Jessie Pope was for getting the troops to sign up, while Wilfred Owen had a completely anti-war persona, which had developed after fighting in the First World War. I shall describe fully and deeply in the upcoming paragraphs the attitudes of both the authors. It all began in August 1914. Otherwise known as the Great War. The cause of it all was the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, whom was the heir to the Austrian throne at that time. This killing happened on the 28th June 1914 in Bosnia, a province that Austria had seized in 1908.Order now
Austria suspected that Serbia had plotted the murder and so attacked Serbia. Russia supported Serbia; therefore Germany declared was on Russia, and France had stood by the Dual Alliance it had made with Russia. Great Britain and the Commonwealth, France, Belgium, Russia, Serbia and Japan formed the Allies, later to be Joined by the United States, Italy, Romania, Greece and several other countries. On the other side were the ‘central powers’ of Germany and Austria-Hungary. Which were soon Joined by Turkey and later, Bulgaria.
The chief cause of the war was Germany’s desire to bread and to obtain more colonies for its growing population and trade. Its powerful neighbor, Germany, dragged the empire of Austria-Hungary into the conflict. When the war began, most of large nations on the European mainland were ready with armies of several million men raised by a… Analysis Who’s for the game’ is a conversational poem through which Jessie Pope’s representation of war encapsulates the Jingoistic opinion of her culture: that war was fun, Jovial and full of glory that any young man could earn if only he had the courage.
In essence, this poem is based around the comparison of war to a sporting game and n lines 1 and 2 we can see this metaphor being created with the words “… The game, the biggest that’s played” and “game of a fight. “. This lighthearted tone continues when Pope utilizes the idea linking nature of rhyme to contrast the ‘courageous’ options and the ‘cowardly options, as can be seen in lines 2 and 4. After reading these lines, it is clear to the reader that Pope has represented war as a game noble and glorious.
On line 11 Pope suggests that the worst thing that could happen too soldier is to return home on crutches – not death – and on lines 7 and 8 Pope asks every young an if they want to take part in the “show’ of war or if they want to Just sit in the “stands”. These 3 lines make evident the crux of the second side to Pope’s representation. In saying that the worst thing that could possibly happen to a soldier is coming home on crutches, Pope has represented war as not only noble and glorious – but harmless!
The modern world hadn’t yet experienced war on as large or costly scale as World War 1 and Jessie pope was only one of many poets whose poems are evidence of this fact. Who’s For The Game is a quintessential Jingoistic poem of that time – one that presents war as honorable, noble, and ultimately, a glory machine for which to work one must only have the same amount of courage that is needed to play a game of sport. War Poem Analysis In this essay I am going to be analyzing three poems and them comparing them to each other.
I am going to be talking about the differences and the similarities of the poems. First I am going to be talking about the three poems in detail. The poem I am going to be analyzing now is “Who’s for the Game” by Jessie Pope. This poem was meant to inspire and make young men Join the war against the opposition. Jessie Pope was a poem writer in the time of the first world war. She wrote a lot of poems like this but this is the most famous. “Who’ll grip and tackle the Job unafraid? And who thinks he’d rather sit tight? In this line she is trying to communicate that if you don’t go then you are a coward because you would rather sit tight while all your friends are fighting for their country. “Who wants a turn to himself in the show? And who wants a seat in the stand? ” In this line she says that if you go then you’ll be famous and respected. If you don’t then you will have to watch your friends being expected and appreciated and have none for yourself. “Who knows it won’t be a picnic-?not much-? Yet eagerly shoulders a gun? ” I think in this line she communicates that she does understand the evils of war.
She says in this line whether or not you are ready to hold a gun with the intentions of killing someone. “Come along, lads” In this line she uses colloquial language again trying to get young men to Join the cause. In the last stanza she is trying to make people feel patriotic. Inform country is up to her neck in a fight, And she’s looking and calling for you. ” She is ring to say that the country is in war and it’s calling to you to help. She also calla’s Britain a she and calling an object a she is showing a sign of affection to it.
She is also calling Britain your mother like a motherland. I think this poem is very effective at making people patriotic and proud. For the Job that it had it was very effective. Many people think that this poem is… Jessie Pope Page 1 of 2 An analysis of Who’s for the Game? By Jessie Pope War is a highly debatable topic that has influenced many poets. An issue that is important in Jessie Pope’s 1914 poem Who’s for the game? This essay will explore a range of literary devices used within the poem to help analyses the explicit and implicit meanings.
Furthermore, it will use appropriate literacy terminology to back up quotes within the poem. Additionally, this essay will analyses the structure of the poem to show how meaning is conveyed. Pope, a naive poet, speaks of a highly debatable topic known to man. However, she makes reference to the war as being a game, she suggests that it is “The biggest that’s played” though, she does not anticipate the destruction which war may bring. The poem is reliant on propaganda which relied heavily on men’s guilt. It could be seen that this encouraged men to fight and defend their county.
This is shown through a literary device, a metaphor. An example being, “And who wants a seat in the stand” the use of this device prominently states that suspecting the war will result in deepest regret because they are not defending their country. It could be suggested that the emphasis of the metaphor helped influence men’s participation in the war. Arguably, though Pope promotes the so called glory of war, it is seen that not protecting their country could result in an invasion. Here, Pope addresses that without soldiers at war, their country could be destroyed.
Alternatively, Pope makes use of personification indicating the realism of war. She writes, Inform country is up to her neck in a fight”. Here, the poet personifies their country as a woman, implying that the war is at its most extreme. This addresses the men that their country needs them the most at this point in time. In contrast, it is clear that the implicit meaning of this literary device exposes the brutality of war, vicious and scary. Jessie Pope has written her poem in a conversational manner making “Who’s for…