Get help now
  • Pages 2
  • Words 365
  • Views 88
  • Download


    Verified writer
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • 4.7/5
    Delivery result 5 hours
    Customers reviews 624
    Hire Writer
    +123 relevant experts are online

    The Power of Hindsight in the War on Terror

    Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get help now

    124 experts online

    NATOWe have already advanced the war on terrorism into Iraq, we have the ability to look back at it with additional knowledge. The expression,” hindsight is 20/20,” is also relevant.

    We have additional knowledge now that we did not have prior to advancing the war on terrorism into Iraq and that knowledge can easily influence our perspective. During the time prior to moving into Iraq, I think we, as a nation, reacted resolutely to stop terrorists and their ability to train. After the events of Sept. 11 the movement into Afghanistan I do not think met with much resistance by the American public. That same public opinion was different for the advance into Iraq. I think the previous action, namely the Gulf War, influenced that reaction as well.

    In the four major paradigms or schools of thought on international relations, the realist school of thought believes politics is a power struggle among nation-states. Thomas Morgenthau is the “father” of realism. Realists have little faith in international law or international organizations. The globalist school of thought focuses on economic interdependence of the global arena.

    Political and economic decisions in one industrialized nation have consequences for all other nations as well as non-state actors. We believe President Bush acted on Iraq primarily using the realist school of thought. The realists have “little faith in international law or international organizations. ” The situation in Iraq had been degrading for some time as Saddam Hussein was not adhering to the resolutions from the Gulf War.

    We tried to get the international community and NATO to back us and agree with our position. But this didn’t happen. I believe President Bush lost confidence in NATO and acted independently. Alternately, we acted with the globalist school of thought in regards to the war on terrorism. The globalist adheres to the idea that political decisions in one industrialized nation have consequences for all other nations.

    We believed that Iraq knowingly housed and harbored terrorists. We also believe that the government in Iraq knowingly and willingly financed and provided equipment to these terrorists. As such the globalist school of thought applies, as well, as the consequences of one nation’s political actions has consequences for other nations.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need custom essay sample written special for your assignment?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    The Power of Hindsight in the War on Terror. (2019, Jan 05). Retrieved from

    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper