We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

In the constructivist classroom Essay

Are you a constructivist? Or, are you a good questioner? Are they
the same or different? Since we have learned about and launched the
emergent curriculum, we can understand about “constructivism”. However,
even though we may have understood “constructivism”, it is not easy to
apply it in teaching. Because younger children can learn many things
quickly like a sponge absorbing water and their ability to think is
developing equally fast, EC educators need to inspire them to find
questions. Even if we do not give them questions, children can develop
their own questions. However, as an EC educator, I would like to be also a
good questioner and would like to help them to think and create their own
ideas because asking a question is a fundamental of education like in the
Socratic teaching and questioning. Thus, I believe that constructivist
educators can bring a fresh approach to children and EC education, and a
renaissance of EC education.

We will write a custom essay on In the constructivist classroom specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now


First of all, according to the article, traditional education
believes that a teacher pours knowledge into passive students. Basically I
do not deny this traditional understanding, because sometimes we need to
learn certain things, such as traditional (performing) arts. However, in
the general education field, especially in EC education, I do not think
that a teacher can deal with all children’s questions and interests through
this traditional education method. One of the qualities of constructivists
is being a good questioner. For example, in my previous placement, a boy
was very interested in transportation. He knew about many different kinds
of transportation. Therefore, I asked him to tell me a story of trains and
to draw me pictures of his favourite transportation. He loved both these
activities. I believe that I was a good questioner and could help him
developing his imagination and drawing skill through asking his favourite
things.


Furthermore, in the constructivist classroom, students often can
find answers or methods with their friends while in contrast students in a
traditional teaching class just listen to a teacher. In the latter they
remember an answer but in the former they remember an approach because the
constructivist does not need to remember the answer only ways to find an
answer. There is no right or wrong way in the children’s exploring and even
if they do not find an answer to a question, but they surly can find
something new or different from each other. Collaboration is one of the
essentials in constructivism because learning is not just individual but
also social. Each student may have a different idea and thus they can find
a lot of ways to lead to solutions. In this process children can learn to
be cooperative and sociable and these skills will be very important for the
children’s future.


There are some problems such as in the constructivist classroom
everyone needs to be active to learn. However, some students might be shy
and do not like to speak in front of others. Since the constructivism is
not only for major group but also for everyone, a teacher needs to find how
to help the quieter or alternative idea child to have a voice. Often
minority opinions are ignored and these sorts of children will become more
hesitant to speak out loud. From my personal experience, I recognize that
children would like a teacher to listen to them. Therefore, whenever I find
children who do not feel comfortable with speaking in public, I try to be
with them and listen to them carefully. Also I try to get them used to
speaking in public little by little by asking and breaking down a question.

In Socratic teaching, teachers give questions to a student, but they answer
them. A teacher is not an authority but a helper in the constructivism
classroom, however, a teacher should always be the model of a good
inquirer.

READ:  Gattaca Essay


In conclusion, basically I support the constructivism because EC
educators need to extend children’s possibilities as much as possible.

Therefore, we should be good questioners to model this skill and through
questioning and searching answers we can let children collaborate each
other in order to enhance social development. Also it is important we do
not forget about minority voices. EC constructivist educators are not
authority figures but helpers for children. It might be not easy to be a
good constructivist, but we are all in the process!

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
icon
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

In the constructivist classroom Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia

Are you a constructivist? Or, are you a good questioner? Are they
the same or different? Since we have learned about and launched the
emergent curriculum, we can understand about "constructivism". However,
even though we may have understood "constructivism", it is not easy to
apply it in teaching. Because younger children can learn many things
quickly like a sponge absorbing water and their ability to think is
developing equally fast, EC educators need to inspire them to fin

2018-12-26 17:37:22
In the constructivist classroom Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews