We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Relationship between information rich in information poor Essay

1. Introduction

In order to discourse Feather ‘s chapter 5 “information rich and information poor” decision of his book “The information Society, a survey of continuity and change” , we need to understand what really is information rich and information hapless in relation to information society. We need to analyse what the political quandary is ; is it merely a political dimension related issue within the information society? Is it a pick? And if there is, which manner should be chosen and see as politically right? And eventually we need to happen what other existent chances or options are given to us. This surely is a treatment full of perplexity on which I will reason that despite the geo-political disagreements between developing states and developed states the “digital divide” is non sine qua non to socio-economic political determinations any longer but has evolved in the past old ages into an Auto-Democratisation and Liberalisation and should be bridged by a more efficient and targeted educational program, internationally applied beyond any economical barriers.

Get quality help now

Proficient in: Relationship
  • 3 Hours Delivery result
  • 24/7 Support
  • 100% Plagiarizm free
hire writer

2. Specifying what information society is

The Internet is the lone mass medium that is freshly created in the 2nd half of last century and as Mehra ( 2004 ) says, the cyberspace has enormous potency to accomplish greater societal equity and authorization and better mundane life for those on the borders of society.

The acceleration of development in information and communicating engineering over the last decennary has a major impact on societal, political, cultural or economical issues. What is the function being played by the Internet in the information society? The Internet is today seen as the polar point of position of the “information society” and can be regarded as a contemplation of our day-to-day world with its multiple chances and danger.

The “information society” produces a “class division” , a clang between people who have n’t entree to the bulk of cognition and those who are “information rich” , lending to the economic wealth. This spread between “haves” and “have-nots” , between “information rich” and “information poor” keeps increasing and has extremist effects of altering or at least well impacting our society. A more critical definition of “information society” given at BusinessDictionary.com combines both:

Post-industrial society in which information engineering ( IT ) is transforming every facet of cultural, political, and societal life and which is based on the production and distribution of information. It is characterized by the permeant influence of IT on place, work, and recreational facets of the persons day-to-day modus operandi, stratification into new categories those who are information-rich and those who are information-poor…

It is by and large referred to as the “digital divide” nomenclature: “the spread between those people who have Internet entree and those who do not” Collins English Dictionary ( 2003 ) . With a somewhat distinction Mehra ( 2004 ) uses adjectives and add the proficient facet of computing machines to this definition. Looking at the multiple and about indistinguishable definitions of “information society” and its inextricable “digital divide” we can reason that by “digital divide” it is meant the splitting of those who use or non utilize Internet resources. the “have-nots” can non entree computing machines and Internet resources and hence are disadvantaged, falling into a an unequal place compared to the ”haves” , the 1 who additions entree to information throughout new engineerings and hence take part actively to the societal, political, cultural and economical life.

This construct comes from “information society” theoreticians, which predicts an exceeding societal impact on the merchandise society, Webster ( 2006 ) . Herbert Schiller ‘s corporate capitalist economy ( p. 128 ) , Jurgen Habermas ‘s public sphere ( p. 163 ) , Anthony Giddens ‘s surveillance and automatic modernization ( p.206 ) , post-modernist Jean Baudrillard ‘s marks meaning ( p. 244 ) or Zygmunt Bauman ‘s liquid life ( p. 260 ) , non to bury Daniel Bell ‘s post-industrial society, techniques and engineerings of production, alteration from Primary Industries such as agribusiness and industrialism to post-industrialism, are the footing for grounds that engineering is cardinal for the productiveness addition and ensuing economic wealth, referred as Technological determinism. ( p. 120 ) . Manuel Castells on the other manus with his web society is concentrating on societal plurality ; go forthing the old on the job category constructs and stratification constructions behind, conveying to it new Parameters like flexibleness and adaptability and herewith become informational Labour, referred as informational Capitalism. ( p. 100 )

3. Are “Haves” and “Have-nots” ever “information-rich” and “information poor” ?

Looking at the given definitions it would about connote that people holding a computing machine and Internet entree would automatically be seen as rich persons, but sometimes in developing states and surely in developed states were consumers widely have entree to these engineerings we meet state of affairss where they are non considered as information rich. We should look at a different attack and formalize the distinction within our day-to-day world.

The “Information poor” are consumers who use traditional mass media information such as telecasting, DVDs, wirelesss and magazines. They possess a broad scope of electronic devices, MP3 participants, PDAs, game consoles and other calculating machines. They are considered as inactive consumers of information and presents as inactive users of new engineerings, downloading digital e-book ‘s, listening to their favorite music, playing computing machine games, reading the last international intelligence. But they do non interact nor make any of this provided Information and are surely non involved in determination pickings.

On the opposite “information rich” stands for a new elite within the information society. They are involved into geting and treating information, utilizing web 2.0 online applications, bring forthing individualized diaries on community platforms, lucubrating group treatments in forums with a certain degree of knowing competency. They are moving at director degrees thanks to their acquired cognition and overall literacy. They are the supporters of this ever-growing information and engineering society who possesses the knowhow of Selective processing, bring forthing and administering information. This selective procedure of measuring provided information is determined by the consumers instead than the manufacturers. Consumers pull out the information that fits their demands to increase the value of the already acquired information.

They allocates their ain standards of values to the chosen information, they can absorb in its entirety, the Values could besides make a certain degree of accretion where the effectual processing of it becomes so uneffective, considered as “information overload” , but the mean “information rich” does cognize how to manage this,

as I will intensify subsequently. Make it now

“The bound is the sky” would be a perfect motto on planet Utopia where every active user would hold become “information rich” , information entree would hold been made limitless, where the cognition boundaries would be bridged on an information rainbow… but on planet Earth our economical world becomes a barrier where the consumers are blocked by the deepness of that handiness made in the acquisition of the needed information. Some are available for free supplied by establishments and governmental governments, some are partly available for promotion intents ( book retail merchants, information suppliers ) and others specifically recognised to be accessible merely with subscriptions or tuition fees. This brings us to the undeniable fact that information consumers are forced to accept the construct of economical value attributed to information by its manufacturer or supplier and herewith underline the political quandary the “information society” is confronted with. Information itself contributes to widen the already bing spread between developing states and developed 1s. We could non hold more on Feather ‘s statementthat the comparative success of the information-rich economic systems, and the comparative failing of those that are relatively information hapless, is in itself an statement for the importance of information.

The attributed values to information are considered by information society theoreticians to be one facet of the development of societal economic societies ; societal, political and cultural wealth have ever been mirrors of strong economic powers where it could boom and take part to its economical success. Following Feather ‘s analysis on developing states, development and development of information engineering has become indispensable and value of information fundamental, as shown with Japan, Singapore and Korea, were scientific and economic information are mostly accessible and beneficially lend to aboriginal economic alterations. But unlike these three economically successful Asiatic states, major distinction could besides be seen within industrialised states ; between the northern extremely agriculturized states and the Southern 1s, handiness ofinformation resources on comparative footing, the consumer additions from information rating but besides could endure in hurt of its productiveness. To what extent information becomes one of the tools and enhances already bing cognition to better long used agricultural and industrial procedures. Information does non go the Centre of its economical wealth while contributes to it. The consciousness based on analysis of acquired information and its ensuing determinations to an sweetening or alterations in primer sector ‘s economic system corroborates the positions information helps “economic societies” but does non germinate to an “information society” as such.

4. The digital divide as political dimension

The inquiry if Internet opens emancipatory possibilities or whether farther enlarges the spread that already exists between the “haves” and “have-nots” remains controversial. You will non accomplish equality by supplying each Third World villagers, cultural minorities or other “have-nots” with a computing machine and Internet entree. Access to information communicating engineering can non be seen as a standalone solution. The beginnings of this disparity are far intensifying within their educational, socio-cultural and socio-economical jobs as Berude ( 2005 ) explains. Early Determination by the Orbicom enterprise, Sciadas ( 2003 ) in coaction with the Canadian International Development Agency, the InfoDev Programme of the World Bank and UNESCO, shows definitively the outrageousness of digital divide, dividing the “haves” and “have-nots” states by many decennaries of development, chiefly concentrated in Africa but some of them besides in the Asiatic country. Despite the fact that the digital divide is by and large talking shutting, this study shows that the advancement made between the poorest and the “in-between” states was non sufficient to shut this disparity, while “upper-middle” states made typical advancement to the top and herewith widen the overall spread between the really rich and really hapless, and this regardless of the acquisition of ICT and put ining new fiberglass high debit telephone lines.

There is an undeniable necessity to get research accomplishments, literacy accomplishments or by and large related computing machine accomplishments before a user can be called an internaut, a supporter: The usage of Internet requires a much higher literacy accomplishment than traditional media like telecasting, wireless or magazines in order to happen analyse and procedure the requested information. There is no title page with tabular array of contents ( publications ) and no fixed agenda ( telecasting, wireless ) on the Internet. The Internet is fundamentally a “pull medium” where aiming specific information, articles, research schemes and selective thought are necessary. Media literacy can hence be considered as a barrier to Internet entree, and this in any type of consumer groups, non merely in developing states but besides in our Western states. Unless there are strong political volitions were ICT is recognized by authoritiess as a development tool, were important attempts are made in instruction, debut to ICT in schools, were learning plans are developed, these states will non hold any important economical growing.

In developed states the Internet was chiefly of beds with higher incomes and educational degrees. ENLARGE VIEW

while the population in many developing states are wholly excluded from entree to the Internet. ENLARGE VIEW

5. Other chances and options

The danger of such a spread within the society can non be minimized that easy and solutions offered by public establishments like “Internet entree for all” in public libraries, set up of information communicating engineerings within public schools or private funded undertakings like Microsoft laminitis Bill Gates ‘ “one computing machine for each children” , were the first rocks set to traverse the spread between information rich and information hapless. But it unluckily is non taking all citizens and coevals groups into history. ENUMERE

It is necessary to light the different societal positions which would incorporate this socio-economical every bit good at it socio-cultural facets in order to make an consciousness of the complicity of this quandary. Bourdieu already suggested and identified this position as overall capital. DESCRIBE

Harmonizing to Bourdieu ( 1993 ) , the overall capital of different fractions of the societal categories is composed of differing proportions of the assorted sorts of capital. It is chiefly in relation to the center and upper categories that Bourdieu elaborates this fluctuation in volume and composing of the four types of capital… … These differences are a effect of complex relationships between single and category flights. Furthermore, the values attached to the different signifiers of capital are bets in the battle between different category fractions

Meritocratic instruction

Particular attending should be thrown on the field of media instruction.

The Internet, as an “ above ” medium influenced the perceptual experience of the users,

the Media literacy is seen against the background of Info-Poor-/Info-Rich-effects.

Therefore, an “ Internet literacy can take ” because of deficiency of cultural assimilation, for illustration when many senior citizens to information-poor effects.

But even in kids and striplings in bend, the media instruction challenged when it comes to issues such as the ability, credibleness with the media, peculiarly via the Internet to measure common information.

6. Decision

By redefining socio-economic spreads between “haves” and “have-nots” and whether it is portion of the political quandary, the information society is on its manner to go a powerful tool that could eliminate universe ‘s poorness. Yet it the staying jobs are non merely to be seen as a sociological battle, but instead are perceived as a pedagogical challenge.

7. Mentions

Beasley-Murray, J. ( 2000, June 15 ) . Value and Capital in Bourdieu and Marx. InI – ‘one-stop shopping ‘ for the existent intelligence. Retrieved December 30, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.williambowles.info/sa/cultural_capital.html

Berude, L. ( 2006 ) . The Digital Divide, or Who Gets to Be Part of the Information Society? Multimedia Information and Technology Digital, 32 ( 3 ) , 26-33.

Families, cultural resources and the digital divide: ICTs and educational advantage. ( 2003, April 1 ) . Australian Journal of Education, 47, 18-39. Retrieved December 30, 2009, from hypertext transfer protocol: //findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_hb6475/is_1_47/ai_n29004669

Feather, J. ( 2008 ) . The Information Society: A Study of Continuity and Change ( 5 ed. ) . London: Facet Publishing.

Sciadas, G. ( 2003 ) . Monitoring the Digital Divide… and Beyond. Montreal, Canada: Orbicom.

Webster, F. ( 2006 ) . Theories of the Information Society: Third Edition ( International Library of Sociology ) . New York: Routledge.

information society definition. ( n.d. ) . BusinessDictionary.com – Online Business Dictionary. Retrieved January 2, 2010, from hypertext transfer protocol: //www.businessdictionary.com/definition/information-society.html

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words


Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

Relationship between information rich in information poor Essay
1. IntroductionIn order to discourse Feather 's chapter 5 “information rich and information poor” decision of his book “The information Society, a survey of continuity and change” , we need to understand what really is information rich and information hapless in relation to information society. We need to analyse what the political quandary is ; is it merely a political dimension related issue within the information society? Is it a pick? And if there is, which manner sh
2021-07-12 23:48:14
Relationship between information rich in information poor Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews