We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Parable of the Sadhu: Analysis from three general Essay

approaches.

The “Parable of the Sadhu” presents a complex situation which action
immediate action was necessary. Sadhu, an Indian holy man, was discovered
naked and barely alive by a group of multicultural mountaineers during
their journey. Each ethnic group did a little to help the Sadhu, but none
assumed full responsibility. Their priority was in climbing the mountain
rather than carrying Sadhu to the village where other people could help
him. Although the conditions of the trip were so that once the mountaineers
went down to the village they might not have been able to come back up, the
author of this essay still feels guilty for what was not done for the Sadhu
(Donaldson 280). There are three general approaches in examining a moral
issue and making a decision, those being consequentialism, deontology and
virtue ethics. The essay does not clearly indicate which method was used to
assess the situation. In my opinion, the best method would be Kantian
deontology.

We will write a custom essay on Parable of the Sadhu: Analysis from three general specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

Let us discuss consequentialism first. Consequentialism focuses on
consequences as the most important factor in the decision making process
(Donaldson 3). For consequentialists the motives of an act are not as
important as what comes out of it. Utilitarianism is one of the branches of
consequentialism. Utilitarianism believes in the greatest good for the
number (Donaldson 3). This method along with egoist consequentialism was
probably the one that was used subconsciously by the mountaineers. Leaving
the Sadhu was fine because in the end the greater amount of people would
have reached their goal and that would have made them happy. Egoist
consequentialists who believe that the greatest good is their own would
have done the same, satisfying their desires before helping someone else
(Donaldson 4). This method, however, is not the best for this situation.

One proving factor is that McCoy still feels guilty about this incident.

Therefore, this method did not produce the most ethical response.

Virtue ethics, unlike consequentialism, focus on the kind of person each
one of us should be. They focus on cultivating certain characteristics and
look at every situation in terms of its potential influence on the morale
of the person (Donaldson 10). This method, although much more helpful than
utilitarianism, still produces an unclear response. On one hand, kindness
and compassion are both virtues that would be cultivated if the
mountaineers decided to help the Sadhu and carry him to the village. On the
other hand, if mountaineers continue their journey virtues such as courage
and determination would flourish. It is difficult to decide which virtues
are more important than others and therefore, this method is too ambiguous
to be applied to this situation.

Finally, there is deontology, also called non-consequentialism. Deontology,
in general, focuses on the motives of the act and the concept of
“duty”(Camenisch 2). Kantian deontology assesses that there is a
Categorical Imperative – the highest moral principle that should govern all
human actions. This universal law is stated in two ways:
1) act in a way that one would act with anyone in the same situation, and
so that one does not create an undesirable world and 2) interact with
people as human beings with rights and dignity rather than means to an end
(Camenisch 2). This moral principle would be the most fair and useful in
the Sadhu situation. McCoy’s friend mentions in the essay that the
mountaineers would have probably acted differently if the Sadhu were a
member of their ethnic group (Donaldson 281). If they used the Kantian
deontology method, its first statement would forbid them from treating
Sadhu differently than they would treat any other person in this situation.

READ:  Drugs And Crime Essay

Also, if for a second the mountaineers considered that they would be
creating a world in which they would not want their children to live, they
would have acted differently. By “creating this world” I mean that they
would not want people to act this way to themselves or their descendants.

And finally, if they were treating Sadhu as a worthy human being, they
would have understood that human life is more valuable than accomplishing a
goal. In this case, they would carry the Sadhu to the village and make sure
that he is taken care of.

One could assume that I find the Kantian deontology method best just
because that is what I think I would use. This, however, is not completely
true. Much of this argument is based on the fact that McCoy still regrets
the way he acted with the Sadhu. Based on this, I assume that if he were in
the same situation again he would help Sadhu more. Kantian deontology seems
to be the most obvious method that would produce this decision. Personally,
I think that all of the methods are too indefinite and therefore none of
them can be said to be the method for decision making in every type of
situation. The question then is how does one know which method should be
used?
Copyright 1999 – 2004 OPPapers.com

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
icon
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

Parable of the Sadhu: Analysis from three general Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia
approaches. The "Parable of the Sadhu" presents a complex situation which action immediate action was necessary. Sadhu, an Indian holy man, was discovered naked and barely alive by a group of multicultural mountaineers during their journey. Each ethnic group did a little to help the Sadhu, but none assumed full responsibility. Their priority was in climbing the mountain rather than carrying Sadhu to the village where other people could help him. Although the conditions of the trip were
2020-05-18 07:48:16
Parable of the Sadhu: Analysis from three general Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews