We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

State Competition and Higher Education: A Race to Essay

the Top?” With MarkInterstate Competition in Health and Welfare Programs (with Mark Rom)
Does state control over redistributive programs make them less generous? Most analyses of interstate competition over welfare (known colloquially as the “race to the bottom,” or RTB) focus solely on benefit levels for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). This paper broadens the analysis to cover multiple welfare programs, multiple measures of generosity, and multiple indicators of state competition. Doing so has two main benefits. First, we can distinguish between competitive behavior by states and intrinsic regional covariation. We examine welfare programs under state control and exempt from it, and include indicators of symmetric and asymmetric competition, and argue that the RTB requires that competitive pressure must restrict welfare generosity, and that this restriction must be present in welfare programs over which states have control and absent from programs exempt from state control. Second, we evaluate multiple measures and programs and so can generalize theories about interstate competition and redistribution. To do so we examine benefits, access, and cost for the AFDC, Medicaid, Medicare and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs between 1975 and 1995. A multivariate model yields strong evidence that state control over redistribution leads across the board to restrictive health and welfare policy.

We will write a custom essay on State Competition and Higher Education: A Race to specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

Interstate Competition in Health and Welfare Programs (with Mark Rom)
Does state control over redistributive programs make them less generous? Most analyses of interstate competition over welfare (known colloquially as the “race to the bottom,” or RTB) focus solely on benefit levels for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). This paper broadens the analysis to cover multiple welfare programs, multiple measures of generosity, and multiple indicators of state competition. Doing so has two main benefits. First, we can distinguish between competitive behavior by states and intrinsic regional covariation. We examine welfare programs under state control and exempt from it, and include indicators of symmetric and asymmetric competition, and argue that the RTB requires that competitive pressure must restrict welfare generosity, and that this restriction must be present in welfare programs over which states have control and absent from programs exempt from state control. Second, we evaluate multiple measures and programs and so can generalize theories about interstate competition and redistribution. To do so we examine benefits, access, and cost for the AFDC, Medicaid, Medicare and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs between 1975 and 1995. A multivariate model yields strong evidence that state control over redistribution leads across the board to restrictive health and welfare policy.

Interstate Competition in Health and Welfare Programs (with Mark Rom)
Does state control over redistributive programs make them less generous? Most analyses of interstate competition over welfare (known colloquially as the “race to the bottom,” or RTB) focus solely on benefit levels for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). This paper broadens the analysis to cover multiple welfare programs, multiple measures of generosity, and multiple indicators of state competition. Doing so has two main benefits. First, we can distinguish between competitive behavior by states and intrinsic regional covariation. We examine welfare programs under state control and exempt from it, and include indicators of symmetric and asymmetric competition, and argue that the RTB requires that competitive pressure must restrict welfare generosity, and that this restriction must be present in welfare programs over which states have control and absent from programs exempt from state control. Second, we evaluate multiple measures and programs and so can generalize theories about interstate competition and redistribution. To do so we examine benefits, access, and cost for the AFDC, Medicaid, Medicare and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) programs between 1975 and 1995. A multivariate model yields strong evidence that state control over redistribution leads across the board to restrictive health and welfare policy.

READ:  Battle Royal - Symbolism Essay

Interstate Competition in Health and Welfare Programs (with Mark Rom)
Does state control over redistributive programs make them less generous? Most analyses of interstate competition over welfare (known colloquially as the “race to the bottom,” or RTB) focus solely on benefit levels for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). This paper broadens the analysis to cover multiple welfare programs, multiple measures of generosity, and multiple indicators of state competition. Doing so has two main

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
icon
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

State Competition and Higher Education: A Race to Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia

the Top?" With MarkInterstate Competition in Health and Welfare Programs (with Mark Rom)
Does state control over redistributive programs make them less generous? Most analyses of interstate competition over welfare (known colloquially as the "race to the bottom," or RTB) focus solely on benefit levels for Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). This paper broadens the analysis to cover multiple welfare programs, multiple measures of generosity, and multiple indicators of state co

2018-12-27 03:21:00
State Competition and Higher Education: A Race to Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews