On the subject of this depression, there is an article written by William Styron which, in the course of describing his own dealings with the disease, he compares it to cancer. It is my own firm opinion that this assertion is perfectly valid, and it can be shown through careful analysis of the causes and effects of both depression and cancer that this is so. In addition, using The Bell Jar as an example of a case of depression, we will see how this comparison makes clear sense. First, we must address the nature of cancer and its effect on the individual bearing it”s weight.Order now
Cancer is the result of a mutation of the genetic material of a cell, resulting in the lack of some inhibiting factor which would otherwise restrict the uncontrolled reproduction of this cell. As a consequence, this cell reproduces without bound, generating a cluster of cells which are reproducing uncontrollably, and which use the resources of the body to an extent beyond their proportional allotment. Eventually, the requirements of the tumor exceed the body”s ability to provide, and the individual dies. Treatment of cancer includes surgery, the use of chemotherapy, and the use of radiation therapy.
Surgeons removing a tumor make every attempt to remove as much of the affected tissue as possible, because the presence of even a single, properly placed cell left after surgery could result in a second bout with the cancer. Chemotherapy entails exposing the cancer to a barrage of chemicals which are toxic, in the hope of poisoning it to death. Unfortunately, these chemicals, which are toxic to the tumor, are also toxic to the patient. Chemotherapy results in a plethora of serious negative side effects for the patient, even for all of it”s ability to fight the disease.
Radiation therapy works by the same premise as chemotherapy, but instead of chemicals it is radiation that is used to try and destroy the cancer. Interestingly enough, often it is radiation which generates the mutation in the genetic material of the cell which causes the cancer, and yet it is possible to treat the cancer with radiation exposure to certain chemicals can cause cancer too, resulting in the same paradox relating to chemotherapy. Now, these treatments for cancer can be related to treatments for depression, as we will see shortly.
Important to any discussion of cancer is a consideration of it”s causes. Because of the statistical nature of genetic mutations, which are the cause not only of cancer but of evolution, more spontaneous, natural genetic mutations must be negative than advantageous. Some of these negative mutations result in cancer. These natural mutations another paradox are caused by sunlight, chemicals in food, and normal biological processes occurring in the cell. In all cases of cancer except for a select few, the victim has nothing to do with the cause of the cancer.
Obvious exceptions include the use of tobacco and the careless exposure of one”s skin to the sun. These situations are ones where the victim is wholly responsible for their condition, though we can still maintain compassion and make medical attempts to remedy their problem. One other issue relating to cancer which needs to be addressed is that of pain related either directly to the cancer, or to its treatment. In many cases of cancer, the patient is in great pain. Often this pain results from the cancer itself, though many times the treatment particularly chemotherapy and radiation therapy results in pain and sickness.
Doctors are permitted to prescribe pain medication, and in some states cannabis, to alleviate this pain, though many times they are reluctant to prescribe pain medication for extended periods of time or cannabis at all because of a fear of raising the suspicions of local or federal drug enforcement agencies. In general, however, the pain of a cancer patient can be satisfactorily soothed, though rarely entirely relieved. A similar discussion of depression is necessary to thoroughly understand the situation, and begins as follows.
Depression is a disease of the mind relating directly to the levels of certain chemicals in the brain. The most integral of these chemicals is called seratonin, and it affects the brain”s way of perceiving the world around it. Low levels of seratonin result in a morbid, somber perception of the world, and is an invariable feature of depression. Simply put depression is a disease which causes the afflicted individual to feel hopeless, to seem to lack a reason for living, and generally to lose the joie du vie which normally accompanies everyday life for the rest of us.
Without doubt, each of us suffers from “the blues” on an occasion, but this only serves to illustrate another key aspect of depression: it”s lingering nature. The normal doldrums for the rest of us will last a day or a week, while depression affects its sufferers for months or years. Indeed, with our own sense of the strain resulting from a few “down” days, we can get an impression of the incredible strain associated with a year-long bout with depression. However, this chemical aspect of depression is perhaps the least important one.
Depression is a disease which usually has a source unrelated to the chemicals in the brain, and it is a combination of these two sides of the depressed coin that results in the disease. An event or a situation in a person”s life can generate enough despair or sadness to generate susceptability to depression. This event can be the loss of a loved one, through death or other means, or a financial situation, or the loss of a job, or the inability to complete a certain task.
Indeed, this particular event, whatever it may be, has a stronger influence over the development of depression than any chemical. Treatment of depression comes from two directions. First, the use of pharmaceutical products is often prescribed by those in the medical community responsible for treating patients suffering from depression. The general intent of these drugs is to increase the levels of seratonin in the brain, as this is the root of depression. So with higher levels of seratonin, the ground is fertile for a recovery.
But the use of drugs is only one aspect of the treatment of depression. In the same way that any chemical imbalance in the brain is less influential over the development of depression than an event generating inordinate sadness, the therapy intended to help the patient deal with that event is more important in the treatment of depression than any drug. Psychiatrists and psychologists are trained to provide patients with psychological tools to deal with these root problems so that the patient himself becomes able to deal with the problem, and so in a way cure himself.
Comparing here depression to cancer, this particular method of treatment is akin to the doctor helping the lung cancer patient stop smoking after the cancer has receded. Indeed, these psychological tools are of value to the patient even after the depression has ended, in order to prevent a relapse, much as the cessation of smoking is necessary to prevent a relapse of the lung cancer. Now, in The Bell Jar, we have Esther who is in the midst of a summer in New York working for a magazine. It is difficult for us to see why she, while experiencing an educational and invigorating summer, could become afflicted with a serious depression.
It is interesting to note that in the face of such apparently good fortune one could develop such a sad disease. One particularly interesting passage in the novel which relates directly to this discussion occurs when Esther goes with Buddy to the hospital and is watching a slide show. “One slide I remember showed a beautiful laughing girl with a black mole on her cheek. “Twenty days after that mole appeared the girl was dead,” the doctor said, and everybody went very quiet for a minute and then the bell rang, so I never really found out what the mole was or why the girl died. p. 51-52 Indeed this mole is reminiscent of a cancer, and it is interesting to note that the mole is never explicitly explained. Much as depression is a disease shrouded in mystery, and often times one never finds out what is wrong with an afflicted individual before they die of the disease, cancer can come and kill with such swiftness that it has all come and gone before any note is taken. Another pertinent passage in the novel which describes a similarity between cancer and depression comes when Esther goes to visit Buddy in the tuberculosis clinic. `Don”t worry,” Buddy laughed. `I”m not positive. ” “Positive? ” “You can”t catch anything. “” p. 75 Although this particular passage is in reference to tuberculosis, it is an accurate description of both cancer and depression. Neither of these disorders can be contracted from another individual, and so treatment of them is simplified by one degree. Because an doctor can treat a depressed patient without concern that his own state of mind might become depressed, he can conduct the treatment with more fervor and intensity.
This is certainly a positive aspect of both cancer and depression yet two more paradoxes because of the implications for treatment and the lack of need for concern in those close to the patient. One last example of a link between cancer ad depression exists in Esther”s consideration of her preconceived notions about her psychiatrist, Dr. Gordon. “Then he would lean back in his chair and match the tips of his fingers together in a little steeple and tell me why I couldn”t sleep and why I couldn”t read and why I couldn”t eat and why everything people did seemed so silly, because they only died in the end. p. 105 Now the importance of this passage exists in the perception maintained by Esther about the insignificance of everything, given that people eventually die and go into the ground. Now, in a patient”s dealings with his own cancer or depression, this is a consideration that must be made again and again. For an individual suffering from cancer, the simple answer is that he would die eventually anyway without the cancer, he is going to die with the cancer, so why not go ahead and finish the job himself?
The parallel simple answer for the individual suffering from depression is that she will die someday anyway, and since she is in such pain as it is now, why not take her own life now. Unfortunately, this logic is exactly that logic the depression spends its entire existence struggling to instill in its victims, and it is precisely the train of thought which is to be avoided by a patient. For if a patient succumbs to this logic, he is trading the beauty of the stars and the joy of a mug of hot tea and the love of a child for utter nothingness.
In conclusion, we can see how the similarities between cancer and depression run deep, and how the same logic used to analyze cancer from a pseudo-medical point of view can also be used to consider depression. We can see that an individual suffering from depression is no more responsible for her situation than another individual suffering from breast cancer, and so a depression patient should be treated accordingly. Most importantly, however, in the last example, we see how an individual who submits to either disease may as well have never lived at all, because of the essential aspects of life he comes to neglect.