We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Strong Vs Weak Affirmative Action Essay

Politics is assuming command of the American economy in the form of pervasive “equal
opportunity” enforcement. In today’s society, everyone is supposed to be equal and have equal
rights, but in employment, there is more discrimination than ever. American citizens need to do
away with affirmative action so that America’s job opportunities can once again be based on
merit, not skin color or ethnicity. Laws have been passed, quotas have been established, and
seemingly, everything has been done to prevent discrimination, but rather than ending
discrimination, these new laws and quotas have begun to discriminate against a new group of
peoplethe qualified white male. America is known as the land of opportunity. The general
theory is that if you work hard enough and you are the most qualified person to receive a job,
you get it, but that is no longer the case. Now, in order to be employed, qualifications do not
always matter as much as the color of a person’s skin or his ethnicity.

We will write a custom essay on Strong Vs Weak Affirmative Action specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

In dealing with this subject, the first question that is always asked is, “What is wrong with
quotas? What is wrong with companies hiring a variety of blacks, Hispanics, women, and white
males?” The problem is not with hiring a variety of people from different ethnic groups. The
problem begins when the person who is best qualified for a job, loses the position to someone
less qualified. More and more, white males are having problems finding jobs because they are
not black or Hispanic or do not have breasts. Affirmative action, which is action in the form
of quotas and special treatment for “protected classes”, has resulted in a politicized hiring
process in which white males are openly discriminated against. A 1984 poll found that one in
every ten white males lost a promotion because of quotas. They have become invisible victims
because the idea of merit hiring has been subverted by politicized hiring, and that has left
the white males no way to defend themselves against this open discrimination. Some have tried
to defend themselves, but litigation proved expensive, exhausting, chancy, and immensely time
consuming. One case remains unsettled after more than six years in litigation. (Brimelow,
Many voices say that quotas are used to right the past wrongs when so many minority groups were
discriminated against, but even immigrants, if they belong to one of the protected classes are
eligible for quota preferences. Leslie Spencer and Peter Brimelow, sociological researchers who
have thoroughly researched the quota system, said that since immigrants can also receive quota
preferences, it is “a pretty clear indication that quotas are not about righting past wrong,
but about political power”. (n. pag.) Just as socialism has collapsed around the globe, the
leading capitalist power has adapted a peculiarly American form of Neosocialism putting
politics (and lawyers) in command of its workplace albeit on the pretext of equality rather
than efficiency. This problem is only becoming worse because America has the most far reaching
equal employment laws found anywhere in the world. (“Counting Costs”)
Many companies are afraid of these laws, and the fear of political punishment makes quotas very
hard to research. A Kmart executive told a researcher, “We’re not letting you anywhere near our
program.” (Brimelow 77) Companies go beyond what is required just to avoid legal trouble. The
manager of corporate employment status at Xerox, a company that uses quotas, states, “We have a
process that we call ‘balanced work force’. In Xerox, everyone understands that, and it is
measurable by its goals and relative numbers. That is the hard business, that is what people do
not like to deal with, but we do it all the time.” (Brimelow and Spencer n. pag.) Sears,
Roebuck and Co. spent fifteen years and twenty million dollars to defeat an EECO discrimination
suit. Sears prevailed mainly because they were able to show proof of a voluntary quota program.

READ:  Atomic Bomb Essay

Many companies cling to programs such as these as a future defense in court even if it means
putting up with some unqualified or incompetent workers. (Brimelow 77)
Not only is affirmative action hurting white males, it is also causing problems among the
protected classes that it is supposed to be helping. Many of these people feel that it is an
insult that the government thinks they need special help to compete in the job market. Yet
others would be extremely offended if this help was taken away from them. Black Police Chief
Clarence Harmon was once in favor of affirmative action until he realized the affect that it
has on his race. He has said that when he was going through school, he enjoyed competing and
keeping up with his white counterparts, but he now realizes that many times in the police
academy black students use affirmative action as a crutch. Black students have been found to
score lower on tests than white students. Harmon believes that this is because they do not
think that they have to work as hard which produces less qualified black officers. (Glastris
Karl Marx insisted that for any sort of class consciousness to arise, there must be
com-munication of a common sense of oppression, but no one can feel this sense of oppression.

With the mass media rarely recognizing quotas, much less portraying white males
sympathetically, Peter Lynch, a sociological researcher, states “White males have been easily
and silently victimized one by one.” (qtd. in Brimelow) With neither conservatives nor liberals
making affirmative action a “big deal,” a classic spiral of silence has occurred whereby people
assume that their doubts are not shared and suppress them, thus mutually intimidating each
other. People are left feeling that nobody will help them. Another problem with this is the
male psychology that “real men don’t cry”. Many men would rather put up with the hurt than to
even tell their friends and relatives. (Brimelow 76)
Most people realize that quotas do hurt people, but what most people do not realize is that
quotas are illegal. The 1964 and 1991 Civil Rights Acts explicitly banned government imposed
quotas, but nevertheless, they immediately spread though the economy. Even though quotas are
becoming more and more popular, there is incredible denial. Some say that affirmative action,
while a regulatory burden, is not massive in scale. Supporters of affirmative action insist
that the 1991 Civil Rights Act did not impose quotas, although its key point was to override a
Supreme Court decision and make work force racial imbalance prima facie evidence of employer
discrimination. (Spencer and Brimelow n. pag.)
California Democratic Representative Don Edwards, who is a mouthpiece of the civil rights
establishment, claimed on the New York Times opinion page that quotas did not exist. This was
said within three weeks of Supreme Court rulings about them. As much as people deny quotas and
deny widespread affirmative action, the facts remain that it is still there and still harmful.

Another way that quotas and affirmative action are very harmful is that they are very
expensive. In 1991, the direct and indirect cost of quotas, of imposing them and complying with
them, amounted to between 112 and 115 billion dollars. The “opportunity cost”, which is what
the economy might have achieved without the misallocative affect of quotas, amounted to at
least 4% of the 1991 Gross National Product, an amount equal to the amount spent on public
schools. (Spencer and Brimelow n. pag.) The revelation of these figures is needed to show the
dangers of a politically motivated employment policy.

Affirmative action hurts everyonewhite males, their wives, their families, the protected
classes, and every other American citizen by hurting the economy. Affirmative action needs to
be done away with, so we can return America to the great country that she once was. People once
came to America to be free to work hard to become qualified for a job. Will people now come
because their skin color will help them receive a job? Martin Luther King said that he would
like to see the day when his children are not judged because of their color, but because of the
content of their character. (Brimelow 76) Every time affirmative action is put into use, our
country is taking another step away from that worthy goal.

READ:  Globalization: Surplus & Minimalism Advantages Essay

Brimelow, Peter. “Spiral of Silence.” Forbes 25 May 1992: 76-77.

Brimelow, Peter and Spencer, Leslie. “When Quotas Replace Merit, Everybody Suffers.” Forbes. 15
“Counting Costs.” Editorial. National Review 15 February 1993: 18.

Glastris, Paul. “Black and Blue.” U.S. News and World Report. 13 February 1995: 43-46.


Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words


Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

Strong Vs Weak Affirmative Action Essay
Politics is assuming command of the American economy in the form of pervasive "equal
opportunity" enforcement. In today's society, everyone is supposed to be equal and have equal
rights, but in employment, there is more discrimination than ever. American citizens need to do
away with affirmative action so that America's job opportunities can once again be based on
merit, not skin color or ethnicity. Laws have been passed, quotas have been established, and
seemingly, everything
2018-12-27 03:23:51
Strong Vs Weak Affirmative Action Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews