By and large. U. S GAAP and IFRS both position depreciation as allotment of cost over an asset’s life. There are three stairss of the depreciation procedure: foremost find depreciable base of the plus.
and so gauge asset’s utile life and last take a method of cost allotment that best lucifers gross flow from the plus. Depreciation methods allowed under U. S. GAAP include straight-line.
units of production. or accelerated methods ( amount of figures or worsening balance ) . Component depreciation is allowed but non normally used. On the other manus.
IFRS allows straight-line. units of production. and both accelerated methods. Component depreciation is required when plus constituents have different benefit forms. Thus the impact of major differences consequences that assets with different constituents will hold different depreciation agendas. which may increase or diminish assets and gross.
Under both GAAP and IFRS. alterations in depreciation method and alterations in utile life are treated in the current and future periods. in other words- non retrospectively. Under IFRS. estimations of utile life and residuary value. and the method of depreciation.
are reviewed at least at each one-year coverage day of the month. For a company presently utilizing GAAP a alteration to IFRS could ensue in a greater frequence of alterations in deprecation rate which in bend could intend less predictable depreciation disbursal. IFRS allows a company to take between two different theoretical accounts in order to value PP & A ; E after it has been recognized on the books: the historical cost theoretical account and the reappraisal theoretical account. Cost theoretical account is like GAAP where PP & A ; E is carried at its cost less any accrued depreciation and any accrued damage losingss. Revaluation theoretical account allows a company to appreciate PP & A ; E on its books to fair value if just value can be faithfully measured. However.
GAAP does non allow reappraisals of PP & A ; E or mineral resources. Therefore for a company presently utilizing GAAP a alteration to IFRS and the usage of the reappraisal theoretical account could take to a significant addition in plus values on the balance sheet every bit good as a corresponding significant addition in depreciation disbursal. For illustration. at the beginning of the twelvemonth a company has a edifice with a transporting value of $ 100. 000 and a staying utile life of 10 old ages that was late valued at $ 300. 000.
Under GAAP. depreciation disbursal for the twelvemonth would be $ 10. 000 ( presuming straight-line ) . While under IFRS.
depreciation disbursal for the twelvemonth could be either $ 30. 000 or $ 10. 000. Mention:Current Major Differences between IFRS and US GAAPhypertext transfer protocol: //post. Nyssa.
org/nyssa-news/2010/04/current-major-differences-between-ifrs-and-us-gaap. hypertext markup language Depreciation & A ; Impairment under GAAP and IFRS hypertext transfer protocol: //belkcollegeofbusiness. uncc. edu/jmcathey/6260/ifrs/Day/Davis % 20 & amp ; % 20Lunt % 20- % 20Depreciation % 20 & amp ; % 20Impairment. pdf
