Emotions affect the constraints of them. History is deluded due to unreliable sources or perspectives. There are many historical “evidences” stating the precedent. All of these indicate different proposals, making the third party undecided about the truth. The misconception of truth may rely on emotions and perspective about history. As an example the perspectives of England and Turkey might be different if WWI is viewed. The conception of reality may be overcome with the power of perspectives. Therefore no ideal evidence is supported. Political sciences may also be lacking support and evidence.
Since there are no correct answers in politics, certainty is difficult being reached. Many of the systems presented remains as in theory. And it is almost impossible to prove what is the right system. By opposing new perspectives and regimes the evidential subject on politics can be changed. Religion is also an influential and important knowledge heavily affecting the society, which may lack physical evidence. There were situations where religion gave strength to the ones facing poverty and socioeconomic difficulty, and times where it was used as an excuse to consecutive wars.
Religion is one of the most debated topics. It settles ethics and the rights. As a very substantial topic in our day, the biggest issue it faces is the evidence and the sensing of the ideology. Since human beings demand to understand and comprehend the idea of religion and God, the issue arises. The idea of religion may only remain as spirit or belief since the ways of knowledge logic and perception does not merely stand in it. It does not remain as a scientific and comprehendible fact, making it questionable.
