Introduction
Unveiling its complex narrative through a dense network of symbols, William Golding’s “Lord of the Flies” is a stunning exploration of human nature and societal breakdown. By painting a stark portrait of marooned boys’ transformation into savages, Golding’s classic employs diverse symbols that offer insightful commentary on the fragility of civilization, the insidiousness of power, and the primal aspects of humanity. Here, we delve into the symbolic landscape of “Lord of the Flies”, unearthing the meanings interwoven into the conch shell, the specter of the beast, and the titular “Lord of the Flies.”
The Conch Shell: Symbolizing Order and Civilization
The conch shell, discovered at the outset of the boys’ adventure, acts as a symbol of order, democracy, and civilization. It is initially employed to gather the boys together, functioning as an emblem of authority that confers the right to speak during assemblies. Golding vividly represents the conch’s luminescence and beauty to parallel the initial allure of structured civilization. However, as the boys descend into savagery, the shell loses its lustre, reflecting the decay of their societal norms. Its ultimate destruction parallels the disintegration of the last remnants of civility, paving the way for total anarchy.
The Beast: A Manifestation of Inner Demons
The beast, initially dismissed as a figment of the littluns’ imagination, morphs into a collective fear that engulfs the entire group. This fear-driven symbol exposes the boys’ loss of rationality and their descent into irrational fear and superstition. However, it is Simon who discerns the real nature of the beast. In his prophetic revelation, the beast is understood as the inherent savagery within each individual—the “beast” in every human heart. The children’s fear of the beast is, in essence, a fear of their inner demons, illustrating Golding’s argument that the true enemy lies within.
The Lord of the Flies: Emblem of Power and Decay
The “Lord of the Flies” or the sow’s head that Jack impales on a stake symbolizes the decay and corruption that power can induce. It serves as a terrifying image of the boys’ descent into barbarism. Moreover, the Lord of the Flies speaks to Simon in a hallucination, revealing the gruesome truth that the beast is an inseparable part of each boy. Here, Golding utilizes this gruesome symbol to underscore the boys’ complete abandonment of their former selves, as they embrace their inherent brutality.
Conclusion
Delving into the symbols embedded in “Lord of the Flies” deepens our understanding of Golding’s exploration of the dark corners of human nature. The decay of the conch shell parallels the boys’ slide into chaos, revealing the fragility of the societal structures we take for granted. The omnipresent, feared beast symbolizes the innate savagery that lurks within each individual, revealing our inherent capacity for destruction. Lastly, the titular Lord of the Flies serves as a chilling reminder of the corruption and decay that can accompany power, highlighting the dehumanizing effects of unrestrained brutality. Each symbol intertwines to depict a haunting, allegorical tale about civilization’s thin veneer and the tumultuous undercurrent of savagery that thrums beneath it. Through these symbols, Golding invites us to reflect upon our own nature and the society we inhabit, prompting us to question: How far are we from the boys on the island?
References
- Golding, W. (1954). Lord of the Flies. Faber and Faber.
- Whitley, John S. (1971). “A Casebook Edition of William Golding’s Lord of the Flies.” New York: The Macmillan Company.
- Dickson, L.L. (1989). “The Modern Allegories of William Golding.” University of South Florida Press.
- Kinkead-Weekes, M., & Gregor, I. (2002). William Golding: A Critical Study. Faber and Faber.
- Baker, J.R. (1988). “Why It’s No Go: Golding’s Lord of the Flies.” Critical Quarterly, 30(3), pp. 31-41.
- Crompton, M. (2010). “A View from the Spire: William Golding’s Later Novels.” Blackwell Publishing.
- Reiff, R. (1967). “Lord of the Flies: Fable, Myth, and Fiction.” Twentieth Century Literature, 13(1), pp. 16-25.
- Frey, N. (2008). “Lord of the Flies: The Educational Value of Golding’s Text.” ERIC Digest.
- Gindin, J. (1965). “Golding’s Lord of the Flies: Pride as Original Sin.” Studies in the Novel, 27(1), pp. 78-85.
- Tiger, Virginia. (1994). “William Golding: The Dark Fields of Discovery.” Calder Publications.