At the turn of the 20 century, there were many activists pursuing there own distinct approach to problem facing black American. The two main activists that stand out are Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. DuBois own two distinct approaches to the problems facing African Americans. In this essay, I will be discussing what each of their own approaches are and what were the political, legal and economic realities of African American life that Washington and DuBois faced and attempted to deal with.
Booker T. Washinton believes that black should have their own economic independence. Washington was born into slavery in his early life during the 1856. His early life and education helped shaped his later thinking, after this he went off to work at a salt mine. After the mine job, he went off to work as a teacher in 1881, then later became the founder of the Tuskegee institute. The Tuskegee institute sought to teach black American the necessary instruction and work skills to make them successful in the current industrial revolution.
Booker T. Washinton belief was that the ability to be independent economically and show themselves as productive members of society would help lead men to true equality. This idea help formed the speech that he later delivered to a mix race audience in 1895. His ideas were openly accepted by blacks who believed in the practical rationality of his approach. His methodology supported for an underlying advance toward equivalent rights, instead of full balance under the law, increasing monetary capacity to back up dark requests for political equity later on.
W. E. B. Du Bois was an American sociologist and historian. He has also became a history professor at atlanta university and he was seen as a member of a Black elite that supported some aspects of ancestry for blacks. Bois’ exploration shows that the post-liberation South didn’t deteriorate into monetary or political disorder. Knowledgeable blacks in the North lived in an alternate society and pushed an alternate methodology, to a limited extent because of their impression of more extensive chances. Du Bois needed blacks to have the equivalent ‘old style’ human sciences instruction as high society whites did, alongside casting a ballot rights and city uniformity. The last two had been apparently allowed since 1870 by protected corrections after the Civil War.
Du Bois had at that point become the nation’s preeminent dark scholarly, having distributed various compelling takes a shot at the states of dark Americans. Rather than Washington, Du Bois kept up that instruction and social equality were the best way to equity and that surrendering their interest would just serve to fortify the thought of blacks as peasants. Following a progression of articles in which the two men elucidated their belief systems, their disparities at last reached a crucial stage when, in 1903, Du Bois distributed a work titled The Souls of Black Folks, where he legitimately reprimanded Washington and his methodology and proceeded to request full social equality for blacks.
In conclusion, both Washington and Du Bois had pursue the same matter. Each having there own unquie approach to the problem of black americans. In the end there belief clashed because each of them belief were little bit different. Each had there own were the political, legal and economic realities of African American life.
