Thrasymachus’ view is that of a perfectly unjust life.
Afterdiscussion Socrates refutes this idea. The three statements made accompanyin life and the world around us, what is seen as everyday life is explainedby Thrasymachus’ aspect of justice. Someone would definitely have tobenefit from another in a good or bad way. There would be no order if itwere not. Justice is accounted as a simple plan to keep everyone in aboutthe same position in society. If it was not the way he explained everyonewould likely stand and rebel against anything they would believe wasunfair.
Everyone would have a different view of what is right, so therewould be nothing to follow. All human would try to outdo all others aroundthem, which can be contrasted as looking for a job. Thrasymachus even ifchallenged by Socrates, he would not completely drop his idea. There can beno justice without injustice, who would know what is just? Justice would beused as a convenience, you would be just to those that can benefit you toreach what you desire, once you are in the position you desire to stay inthe same position you would definitely have to be unjust. If justice werejustice everyone would eventually be their own boss. Everyone would feelsomething is owed to them; many would be at odds with one another.
No mancan ever be completely happy in his life to be happy he would have tounjust in one occasion or another. You can’t have one without the other.
