Get help now

Socrates Vs. Crito: Essay (1081 words)

  • Pages 5
  • Words 1081
  • Views 360
  • Download


    Verified writer
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • rating star
    • 5/5
    Delivery result 2 hours
    Customers reviews 339
    Hire Writer
    +123 relevant experts are online

    Academic anxiety?

    Get original paper in 3 hours and nail the task

    Get help now

    124 experts online

    A Decision of LifeCourtneyIntro. to PhilosophyMay 29, 2000Summer Pre-SessionSocrates vs. Crito:A Decision of LifeThe dialogue Crito, by Plato, recounts the last days of Socrates, immediately before hisexecution was going to take place in Athens. In the dialogue, Socrates’ friend, Crito, proposesthat Socrates escape from prison.

    Socrates considers this proposal, trying to decide if escapingwould be “just” and “morally justified. ” Eventually, Socrates concludes that the act is considered”unjust” and “morally unjustified. ” Socrates decides to accept his death penalty and execution. Socrates was a man who would pursuit truth in all matters (Kemerling 1999).

    In hisrefusal to accept exile from Athens or a commitment to silence as a penalty, he takes the penaltyof death and is thrown into prison. While Socrates is awaiting his execution, many of his friends, including Crito, arrive with afoolproof plan for his escape from Athens to live in exile voluntarily. Socrates calmly debateswith each friend over the moral value and justification of such an act. “. . .

    people who do not know you and me will believe that I mighthave saved you if I had been willing to give money, but that I didnot care. “-Crito (Plato 569)Crito believed that by helping Socrates to escape, he could go on to fulfill his personalobligations. Also, if Socrates does not follow the plan, many people would assume that hisfriends did not care about him enough to help him escape or that his friends are not willing to givetheir time or money in order to help him. Therefore, Crito goes on to argue that Socrates oughtto escape from the prison. After listening to Crito’s arguments, Socrates dismisses them as irrelevant to a decisionabout what action is truly right. “Now you, Crito, are not going to die to-morrow-.

    . . -and thereforeyou are disinterested and not liable to be deceived by the circumstancesin which you are placed. “-Socrates (Plato 571)In the arguments that Socrates makes, what other people think does not matter. The onlyopinions that should matter are the ones of the individuals that truly know.

    “The truth alonedeserves to be the basis for decisions about human action, so the only proper approach is toengage in the sort of careful moral reasoning by means of which one may hope to reveal it”(Kemerling 1999). According to Socrates, the only opinion that he is willing to consider wouldbe that of the state. “. .

    . if you go forth, returning evil for evil, and injury for injury,. . . we shallbe angry with you while you live, and our brethren, the laws in the worldbelow, will receive you as an enemy; for they will know you have doneyour best to destroy us. “-Socrates (Plato 577)Socrates’ argument moves from one of a general moral decision to the morality of hisspecific case.

    He basically says:-One ought never to do wrong,-But it is always wrong to disobey the state,-Therefore, one ought never to disobey the state (Kemerling 1999)Since avoiding the sentence handed down by the jury would be disobeying the state, Socratesdecides not to escape. Socrates chose to honor his commitment to truth and morality, eventhough it cost him his life. One of the main arguments made by Socrates,”Think not of life and children first, and of justice afterwards, butof justice first. . .

    For neither will you nor any that belong to you behappier or holier or juster in this life, or happier in another, if youdo as Crito bids. “-Socrates (Plato 577),is one of the most important and crucial in the Crito dialogue. Socrates provides a very convincing argument of why he should not escape from theAthenian prison. He states that if he does as Crito suggests and escapes, it will not be justifiablenor true.

    Although his family and friends will be much happier if he escapes, he will not followthe justice or moral code of the state in which he was born and raised. Socrates also gives the idea that if he were to escape, his family and friends would behappy for him, but their fellow citizens and their state in which they reside would not. Thegovernment and citizens of the state may take their frustration of this injustice out on the friendsand family of Socrates. In this argument, Socrates believes that the state would say, “think not of life and childrenfirst, and of justice afterwards”(Plato 566). He says this as a counter-argument to statement madeby Crito saying that he should think of the children that he would be abandoning by not escaping.

    Crito said that he should escape and raise and teach his children, instead of keeping his penalty. Socrates’ statement instead comes from the other end, where he should not think of his childrenfirst, but of the truth and morality of the state in which his children will live and grow. If he doesescape, the state will lose some of that morality, and his children will be looked down upon. Also,his children will not receive the same kind of justice that they may have gotten if he had notescaped.

    Justice seemed to be a very important factor to Socrates, and is part of his pursuit of truthfor all matters. Justice and truth, in the Crito dialogue, go hand-in-hand. Without truth, justicecannot prevail over the wrongdoing in life. Socrates believed that it is always wrong to break an agreement, and continuing to live hislife voluntarily in the state of Athens, constitutes disobedience against the state. He argues thatobeying the state is a requirement right up until death. He says that by not obeying the state thathe was raised in, is like not obeying his parents that raised him.

    Socrates was a man who chose his commitment to truth, morality and philosophy over life. He had a great commitment to his state, therefore by disobeying it, he would be committingsuicide in a sense. If Socrates had disobeyed his state, he would never be allowed to enter itagain, nor would any other allow him to live peacefully. His arguments throughout the whole dialogue were very strong and made sense. Socrateslooked out for his state, while Crito’s arguments were based on himself and how others wouldview him.

    Socrates’ conclusion to stay in the prison may have cost him his life, but saved themorality and truth of Athens. BibliographyKemerling, Garth. “Socrates: Philosophical Life”. 29 May 2000*http://people. delphi. com/gkemerling/2d.

    htm*. Stumpf, Samuel Enoch. “Plato: The Problem of Intellectual and Moral Consistency”. Philosophy:History & Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

    BibliographyBibliographyKemerling, Garth. “Socrates: Philosophical Life”. 29 May 2000. Stumpf, Samuel Enoch. “Plato: The Problem of Intellectual and Moral Consistency”.

    Philosophy:History & Problems. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1994.

    This essay was written by a fellow student. You may use it as a guide or sample for writing your own paper, but remember to cite it correctly. Don’t submit it as your own as it will be considered plagiarism.

    Need custom essay sample written special for your assignment?

    Choose skilled expert on your subject and get original paper with free plagiarism report

    Order custom paper Without paying upfront

    Socrates Vs. Crito: Essay (1081 words). (2018, Dec 29). Retrieved from

    We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

    Hi, my name is Amy 👋

    In case you can't find a relevant example, our professional writers are ready to help you write a unique paper. Just talk to our smart assistant Amy and she'll connect you with the best match.

    Get help with your paper