Since this paper deals with the idea of integrity in leadership, it is useful to start this paper by defining integrity. Webster’s dictionary defines integrity as “uncompromising adherence to a code of moral, artistic or other values; utter sincerity, honesty and candor, avoidance of deception, expediency, or shallowness of any kind” Let us exam this definition a bit deeper. The first part of the definition talks of uncompromising adherence. This means that one would always choose the “right” path, regardless of what seems to be more appealing. Take the example of when and when not to lie.
A person of integrity would always tell the truth regardless of the situation. The second part of the definition deals with what to avoid. Integrity demands complete openness always. The leader of integrity would never try to knowingly deceive his constituents at any time.
The leader would always be open and honest. Theories of IntegrityThere are many different theories of integrity, but this draft will only discuss two. The first, Integrity of Self Interests, will deal with integrity as it pertains to a leader’s best course of action for himself. The second, Integrity of Utility, will deal with integrity as it pertains to the best course for the population. The integrity of Self InterestsIs it better to lie or tell the truth.Order now
Trying to analyze this question using the theory of self-interests would depend upon which choice would give the best results for the leader. This is the underlying theme for the theory of self-interest. There are two basic formulas that can be used when trying to determine what is moral, and they are:1. We should choose the action(s) that we feel, with good reason, will benefit us more than any other choice 2.
We should choose the action(s) that are in our best interests, or that we prefer for the best-perceived outcome these two formulas can be implemented when making any decision. If you feel something will benefit you, or that you prefer one choice over another, then that choice is a choice of the integrity of self-interest. To illustrate this better, let us go back to the earlier example of when to lie. By applying either of these two formulas, lying can be considered moral. If lying were either in our best interests or one perceives it to result in the best outcome, than it is moral to lie.
However, if your decision was to fulfill neither of these two formulas, then it would not be moral, and one should make another choice. The integrity of UtilityFirst, it is important to define the idea of utility. Utility, defined in its simplest form, is doing what will produce the greatest good for the greatest number of the leader’s constituents. Therefore, under this theory of integrity, the leader must consider what is best for his community. This means disregarding his own personal interests.
To go back to the example of whether to lie, it would be important to predict the result before making the decision. If lying was a better choice for more people, then it would be moral to lie, or the opposite is also true. It is very hard to determine the greatest good, but there are some concepts to look at when making a decision. They are:1. A leader should choose the action(s) that would perform more total good than any other act would have produced 2.
Consider the gross good versus the net good. Which action(s) will produce the greatest good minus the bad consequences 3. Choose the action that is the “lesser of two evils,” which means it will produce fewer bad consequences 4. Consider all the consequences, and the action(s) that produces the greatest short and long-term good is the preferred action(s)When making a decision under this theory, it is only necessary to consider one or two of these concepts. No choice will ever satisfy all the concepts, but it is a leader’s job to know how to make the decision while upholding the integrity of a leader.
AnalysisNow to consider the two questions posed at the beginning of this draft. 1. Is integrity relevant in leadership? 2. the idea of a Good versus Effective LeaderRelevance of IntegrityIntegrity is relevant in leadership.