Paper Title:Order now
Geology a science of lies Essay
Geology: A Science of Lies
Geologists have put together a column that is supposed to show all the life
and the different eras and times in which they existed. Scientist claim that
there are several examples of the geologic column found in nature. But there is
not. There are several proofs out there that show that the geologic colunm does
not exist. Because even Charles Darwin said in his book The Origin Of The
Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely-graduated organic chain
To come to an educated conclusion you must study what science believes.
Scientist have come up with what they call a geologic column which is supposed
to show all the different geologic periods.
Quaternary 1 Men
Tertiary 74 Mammals
Cretaceous 60 Reptiles
Jurassic 30 &
Triassic 40 Flowering Plants
Permian 25 Amphibians, Ferns,
Pennsylvanian 25 &
Mississipian 25 Conifers
45 First Land Plants
Ordovician 65 Invertebrates
1 TO 2 BILLION YEARS AGO
Evolutionists say that there are several examples in rock of all these
different eras. But what they tend to ignore is that if fossils for the geologic
record were assembled together in layers in one location, those layers would
extend 130 miles into the earths crust. The earths crust is only 25-30
What comes, as a shock to most students of geology, myself included, is that
the geologic column does not exist anywhere? It is just a paper column. The
Grand Canyon is supposed to be one of the very best examples of the exposed
Evolutionists claim that it represents more than a billion
years of life history. But if you were to look at the strata of the Grand
Canyon, you would notice that 8 periods are missing.
Grand Canyon Strata
That is 325 billion years of missing strata.
Another problem that evolutionary geologists have faced is the problem of
flip-flopped strata. By that I mean that there are several places where strata
from an ancient period will be found on top of the strata of a more recent time.
An example for this point is an area in Wyoming near Yellowstone Park.
there is a sixty mile long stretch of Paleozoic strata laying on top of Tertiary
strata which is 250 million years younger. According to the geologic column this
would be impossible. Anouther blatant example of flip- flopped strata is found
in the Swiss Alps on a mountain called Mythen Peak.
This chart dramatically illustrates this point.
Textbook Arrangement in
Geologic Table the Mythen Peak
In Dr. Walter Lamments says in his article Growing Doubts: Is Evolution
The actual percentage of areas showing this progressive order from the
to the complex is surprisingly small. Indeed formations with very complex
forms of life are found resting directly on the basic granites. Furthermore, I
have in my own files a list of over 500 cases
that attest to a reverse order, that is simple forms of life resting on top
of more advanced types.
These instances are very confusing to supporters of evolution. Sir Archibald
Geikie, Director General of the British Geological Survey, said about the areas
where the textbook strata are so mixed up.
Had these sections been planned for the purpose of deception, they could
have not been more skillfully devised;and no one coming first to this ground
would suspect that what appears to be a normal stratigraphical sequence is not
How much more proof do you need to show that the geologic column was created
by man on paper and is never shown to be true through actual fossil or
If the geologic time table idea of ancient earth history were true, people
could expect to see these following circumstances in the geo-record.
1. The oldest strata would not contain as many life forms as the younger
2. The earliest types of life will be very simple.
3. As the strata went from the lower and oldest strata to the younger upper
strata you would see a clear cut picture of evolutionary development from
primitive organisms to more advanced organisms.
The truth is however is that there is no complete evidence of this. All the
fossil record shows us is that all life started in the Cambrian period. If
evolutionists were correct there would be a gradual progression into the life of
the Cambrian period, which there is not. Even Walter Sullivan who is a supporter
of evolution stated that
The entire first part of evolutionary history is missing
Scientist can not explain the absence .