We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Genna Anderson Anderson Essay

Genna AndersonAnderson1Professor McGintyEnglish 130119 November 2002Should They Have The Right?In recent years the debate over the question of whether terminally illpeople should have the legal right to obtain a physicians help in endingtheir lives has intensified. People possess assurance in the convictionthat mentally ill patients should have the right to seek a physician’sassistance to bring about an end to their lives. Within approximately every state, assisted suicide has not beenprohibited or conceded by law. Over twenty state legislatures haveconsidered and defeated similar laws.

Respected medical professionals occupy their positions on either sideof this debate. Much like the controversy over abortion, this debate isemotionally charged in which morality, medical ethics, as well as religionall play their parts. Both opponents and proponents of assisted suicidebelieve that their position is the most compassionate and morally correctone. Should mentally competent terminally ill people encompass the right toseek a physician’s assistance in this matter? A terminally ill individualshould have the privilege to establish how and when to surrender thestruggle for his or her own existence.

We will write a custom essay on Genna Anderson Anderson specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

Terminally ill people should havethe right to “die with dignity” and to avoid a prolonged death in whichthey may be in excruciating pain, heavily medicated, and completelydependent on others for help in completing every day tasks. People areanxious of this type of suffering and helplessness that corresponds withthis type of death, and if given the chance, would prefer not to endurethis pain. Anderson 2Assisted suicide must be legalized. If a person’s life hasdeteriorated to the point of misery, then no government or medical facilityshould be allowed to force that person to go on living in misery. There isminute difference between the right to refuse treatment to continue life,and the right to obtain medication to terminate life.

Supporters say thatlegal assisted suicide is a compassionate response to dying people who wantto know that they can choose a death that they feel is dignified if theydecide to do so. Many physicians already help their terminally ill patients to die byprescribing them overdoses of legal drugs when asked to do so. Bearing inmind that this practice is recurrent, it should be legalized and regulated. Physicians can be given guidelines to follow on this practice to ensurethat safeguards are implemented.

Those against assisted suicide say that legalization will havedisastrous consequences for the patients. How can this be so? Must theseindividuals actually be made to suffer in such a way that they experienceembarrassment for the reasons that they are dependent? Should individualsbe required to experience pain to the extremity of his or her demise?Nobody would wish to endure this agony. The issue of assisted suicideshould not be a controversial topic. Nobody desires to experience the painof life-threatening illness. Should he or she be required to tolerate theagony, when there is only a questionable amount of time?The caring for and emotional anguish caused for the loved onesinvolved should also be considered. When there is not anything to lookforward to, he or she stands by and watches as the individual that theylove gradually fades away.

Loved ones ought to be able to advance forwardand establish in on his or her grieving process. Instead, he or she goesall the way through this grueling process more than once. He or shecommences the initial grieving processAnderson 3as soon as their loved one is diagnosed with this terminal illness. Inaddition, they begin the grieving process for a second time once they havewitnessed them pass. Individuals should possess the privilege to choose whether he orshe wants to undergo pain for the remainder of his or her existence.

Ifthey desire, he or she should not have to endure the agony that goes alongwith the medical condition in which he or she has been forced to subsistwith. When terminally ill patients are given medication to cease theirpain, they are given so much medication that they sometimes do not know whothey are. Individuals should not be required to undergo this type ofexperience. People who are opposed to assisted suicide have not had theexperience of suffering the loss of someone with a terminal illness. Terminally ill patients are given a hesitant amount of time to reside inthis world, and this time is not in respectable health. They are verydistraught under the medication that they are given, and when not givenmedication, can endure serious pain.

READ:  There were many motives that impelled European nat Essay

Individuals should not be forced to endure pain of this enormity. Nobody should require an individual to suffer with a terminal illness whenthere are other opportunities for him or her to explore. There are manythings in life for which individuals take for granted, yet it is okay forus to sit and watch as the individuals that people love suffer.

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
Genna Anderson Anderson Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia
Genna AndersonAnderson1Professor McGintyEnglish 130119 November 2002Should They Have The Right?In recent years the debate over the question of whether terminally illpeople should have the legal right to obtain a physicians help in endingtheir lives has intensified. People possess assurance in the convictionthat mentally ill patients should have the right to seek a physician'sassistance to bring about an end to their lives. Within approximately every state, assisted suicide has not beenprohib
2018-12-27 03:42:30
Genna Anderson Anderson Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews