We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

NAFTA Argumentative Essay

Effective on January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) was enacted as a new dream, one designed to enhance the economies
and production of goods for the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Since its
conception, it was, and still remains today a controversy over the potential
greatness and predictive results vs. the actual facts and figures that have been
witnessed. Now, only some five years later, many would agree that this dream
has developed into a nightmare for those on all sides of the border. This
agreements far-reaching and damaging effects have been felt–in the United States–
mostly by the small business owners, and the individual middle-to-lower class
worker. I will expand on these points, however, I must also mention the plight of
our nations neighbors, who share in the consequences of this pact. NAFTA is on
its way to marking a decline in the American economy, an increase in
unemployment, and a general deterioration in the morale of the workforce in
The glorious theory of NAFTA sure sounded innocent enough. In fact, it
painted the beautiful picture of North American countries holding hands in a
union bound for excellence. Together, they would strive for a common wealth
and to each, a revival of imports and exports; thus improving the economic
traditions of all. Free trade (eliminating tariffs) between countries and
expansion of sales across the border were the main objectives in the agreement,
and each side had something to gain through the process(Online, 1). Canada, who
imports vast amounts of agricultural products, appreciated the elimination of
tariffs on the goods that are brought into their country. For the United States,
the opportunities were many. The expansion of trade meant more product
needed, therefore more jobs would be created to employ the people. It also
allowed for the establishment of manufacturers anywhere in North America
without any exchange penalties. This is what made it possible to abuse the
cheaper labor in Mexico to make American products and then sell these back to
the Americans at the same price. Mexico had bright hopes for the future, also. It
seemed they had been granted a more respectable position in international
commerce. In addition, it could also provide more jobs for their poverty-stricken
public(Creations, 1-5). Collectively, these merits looked great on paper and
achieved much support from both democrats and republicans, providing for its
passing in both the Senate and House of Representatives. In its only opposition,
were mostly labor unions, knowing the effects of the cheaper Mexican labor; and
human rights groups, fearing the rights of the Hispanic laborers would be
In Mexico, NAFTA has not lived up to any of its expectations. The salary
that the workers accrued has remained the same, and in many cases has
decreased, because of competitiveness. However, their average production has
increased 36.4% since NAFTAs implementation. In turn, since they are working
more and earning less, these employees have experienced a definite decline of
purchasing power. In 1997 alone, over 7.7 million Hispanic employees were being
paid less than the legal minimum wage of $3.40….. A DAY!! Overall, the middle
class of Mexico is disappearing. Since NAFTAs birth, the country has been forced
to watch as at least eight million would be middle class Hispanics were being cast
out into poverty. These results can be directly attributed to NAFTA because, in
the ten years before the plan, the poverty rate maintained a constant figure of
34%; yet from 1994 to 1997 the rate went to 60%, almost doubling in three
years(*Watch, 1-93). The working conditions of these laborers have not improved
either. These substandard facilities are often much more dangerous and
uncomfortable than the label sweatshop implies.
America has not fared much better than Mexico. Actually, I should say
American people are not any better off.. The scales are tipped heavily by the
stories of NAFTA victims, with not much recoil from success stories. In a study
conducted by the Public Citizens Global Trade Watch, some 60 of 67 companies,
who had specifically promised to produce jobs, had failed to meet their goal or
even expand their business in Mexico. In fact, these companies had documented
layoffs due to NAFTA. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, approximately
214,902 American workers have been classified ….as being laid off due to NAFTA.
Furthermore, the Commerce Department canceled a survey program of U.S.

READ:  America Through the Brush of Norman Rockwell Essay

We will write a custom essay on NAFTA Argumentative specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

companies to prove NAFTAs job creation, because the results were so
embarrassing–less than 1,500 jobs could be accounted for (*Watch, 1-93). There
are many reasons for the loss of jobs. The most obvious and the most disgraceful
is that of the big corporations moving their factories to Mexico. This is insulting
to the American working class and an exploitation of the workers south of the
border. Some may only argue this is capitalism, but whatever the argument, it is
harmful for everyone but the company owner. A vast sector of the jobs being
destroyed by NAFTA, are those in either automobiles or electronics; jobs that are
consistently paying above average wages. Those who are not losing their jobs, are
getting paid less for doing them. By threatening that their jobs will be moved to
Mexico, workers are forced to accept lower wages and benefits to do the exact
same work that they have always been doing. This also disables the unions and
therefore gives the people absolutely no say so in the matters(Teamsters, 3).
What choice do they really have when competing for their jobs, with those who
will work for less in one entire day than the Americans will in an hour?? This
accounts for the drop in morale of employees. Workers are not the only
individuals who are hurt by the agreement. Small business owners are being run
out of their venture, with the competitions ability to reduce prices (by paying
workers less or relocating). This cycle is only widening a gap between the upper
and lower classes, making the rich, richer and the poor, poorer. Nonetheless, the
people know exactly whom to blame for these troubles they are having. In
recent opinion surveys, the results show that most Americans are mindful of
66% of Americans believe that free trade agreements…….

66% of Americans believe that NAFTA has helped only the
73% of Americans believe that NAFTA has directly hurt the
small businesses of the United States.

58% of Americans agree that foreign trade has been bad for
our economy and cheap imports have cost jobs and wages.

81% of Americans say that Congress should not accept
anymore trade agreements concerning consumer safety,
labor, or the environment(Watch, 1-59).

It appears that I am in agreement with the given American prospective, in
that NAFTAs disappointments are rampant. The information and statistics that
are provided for us are astounding. Every set of data seems to pinpoint the same
conclusion time and again, yet I cannot see as anything is being done to curb the
damages. Those same ones who said that NAFTA would work are still claiming
that it is working now, and those who opposed in the first place, are still opposing.
It seems as though our NAFTA politics are at a standstill, while unemployment
and the economy are not. But something must be done about this situation now,
before it develops into a disaster for all parties concerned. I firmly believe that
NAFTA has the potential to damage our nations economy, drastically increase our
unemployment, and to stunt the pride and nationalism that is felt for our
country. That is, of course, if it hasnt done that already
Bibliography:
Bibliography
Berner, Bernhard, Kutler. eds. Firsthand America: A History of the United
States. 4th edition. Vol. 2. Chapter 29. Brandywine Press. St. James,
New York. 1996
Creations, Spider Byte Web. The North American Free Trade Agreement: An
Overview. Background. 1997. 7 paragraphs. Online. Internet
Explorer. (25 May 1999).


Online, FAS. The North American Free Trade Agreement. 2 June 1998. 4
paragraphs. Online. Internet Explorer. (25 May 1999).

READ:  Counter Reformation Essay


Teamsters, International Brotherhood of. NAFTA: Fast Track to a Pink Slip.
Leaflets. 1996-1999. 3 paragraphs. Online. Internet Explorer. (25
May 1999).


Watch, Public Citizens Global Trade. NAFTAs Broken Promises: Failure to
Create U.S. Jobs. Table: Job Promises and Reality. January 1997. 59
paragraphs. Online. Internet Explorer. (25 May 1999).


*Watch, Public Citizens Global Trade. NAFTA at Five Years Report Card. 22
December 1998. 93 paragraphs. Online. Internet Explorer. (25 May
1999).

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
icon
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

NAFTA Argumentative Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia

Effective on January 1, 1994, the North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) was enacted as a new dream, one designed to enhance the economies
and production of goods for the United States, Canada, and Mexico. Since its
conception, it was, and still remains today a controversy over the potential
greatness and predictive results vs. the actual facts and figures that have been
witnessed. Now, only some five years later, many would agree that this dream
has developed into a ni

2018-12-27 03:22:51
NAFTA Argumentative Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews