We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Machiavelli’s View of Human Nature Essay

In The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli presents a view of governing a state that is
drastically different from that of humanists of his time. Machiavelli believes
the ruling Prince should be the sole authority determining every aspect of the
state and put in effect a policy which would serve his best interests. These
interests were gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political power.1 His
understanding of human nature was a complete contradiction of what humanists
believed and taught. Machiavelli strongly promoted a secular society and felt
morality was not necessary but in fact stood in the way of an effectively
governed principality.2 Though in come cases Machiavelli’s suggestions seem
harsh and immoral one must remember that these views were derived out of concern
Italy’s unstable political condition.3
Though humanists of Machiavelli’s time believed that an individual had much to
offer to the well being of the state, Machiavelli was quick to mock human nature.

We will write a custom essay on Machiavelli’s View of Human Nature specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

Humanists believed that “An individual only ‘grows to maturity- both
intellectually and morally-through participation’ in the life of the state.”4
Machiavelli generally distrusted citizens, stating that “…in time of adversity,
when the state is in need of it’s citizens there are few to be found.”5
Machiavelli further goes on to question the loyalty of the citizens and advises
the Prince that “…because men a wretched creatures who would not keep their
word to you, you need keep your word to them.”6 However, Machiavelli did not
feel that a Prince should mistreat the citizens. This suggestion once again to
serve the Prince’s best interests.


If a prince can not be both feared and loved, Machiavelli suggests, it would be
better for him to be feared bey the citizens within his own principality. He
makes the generalization that men are, “…ungrateful, fickle, liars, and
deceivers, they shun danger and are greedy for profit; while you treat them well
they are yours.”7 He characterizes men as being self centered and not willing
to act in the best interest of the state,”and when the prince is in danger
they turn against him.”8 Machiavelli reinforces the prince’s need to be
feared by stating:
Men worry less about doing an injury to one who makes himself loved than to
one who makes
himself feared. The bond of love is one which men, wretched creatures they
are, break
when it is to their advantage to do so; but fear is strengthened by a dread of
punishment
which is always effective.9
In order to win honor, Machaivelli suggests that a prince must be readily
willing to deceive the citizens. One way is to “…show his esteem for talent
actively encouraging the able and honouring those who excel in their
professions…so that they can go peaceably about their business.”10 By
encouraging citizens to excel at their professions he would also be encouraging
them to “…increase the prosperity of the their state.”11 These measures,
though carried out in deception, would bring the prince honor and trust amongst
the citizens, especially those who were in the best positions to oppose him.


Machiavelli postulates that a prince must also deceive those who attempt to
flatter him.


In choosing wise men for his government and allowing those the freedom to
speak the
truth to him, and then only concerning matters on which he asks their opinion,
and nothing
else. But he should also question them toughly and listen to what they say;
then he
should make up his own mind.12
Since each person will only advice the prince in accord to his own interests,
the prince must act on his own accord. Machiavelli discourages action to taken
otherwise “…since men will always do badly by the prince unless they are
forced to be virtuous.”13 Machiavelli actively promoted a secular form of
politics. He laid aside the Medieval conception “of the state as a necessary
creation for humankinds spiritual, material, and social well-being.”14 In such
a state,”a ruler was justified in his exercise of political power only if it
contributed to the common good of the people he served, and the ethical side
of a princes activity…ought to be based on Christian moral principles….”15
Machiavelli believed a secular form of government to be a more realistic type.

READ:  On November 22, 1996 the last piece of a massive t Essay

His views were to the benefit of the prince, in helping him maintain power
rather than to serve to the well being of the citizens. Machiavelli promoted
his belief by stating:
The fact is that a man who wants to act virtuously in every way necessarily
comes to grief
among those who are not virtuous. Therefore, if a prince wants to maintain
his rule he
must learn not to be so virtuous, and to make use of this or not according to
need.16
Machiavelli’s was that, “God does not want to do everything Himself, and take
away from us our free will and our share of glory which belongs us.”17
Having studied and experienced Italy’s political situation, Machiavelli derived
these views. He felt that his suggestions would provide a frame work for a
future prince of Italy to bring about political stability. Machiavelli writes:
Italy is waiting to see who can be the one to heal her wounds, put and end to
the sacking
of Lombardy, to extortion in the Kingdom and in Tuscany, and cleanse those
sores which
have been festering so long. See how Italy beseeches God to send someone to
save her from
those barbarous cruelties and outrages; see how eager and willing the country
is to follow
a banner, if someone will raise it.18
Although Italy had become the center of intellectual, artistic and cultural
development, Machiavelli did not feel these qualities would help in securing
Italy’s political future. His opinion was that Italy required a leader who
could have complete control over Italy’s citizens and institutions. One way of
maintaining control of was to institute a secular form of government. This
would allow the prince to govern without being morally bound. Machiavelli’s
view of human nature was not in accord to that of humanists who felt that an
individual could greatly contribute to the well being of the society.

Machiavelli, however felt that people generally tended to work for their own
best interests and gave little obligation to the well being of the state.


Although Machiavelli doubted that this form of government could ever be
established it did appear several years after he wrote The Prince. Machiavelli
has become to be regarded as “the founder of modern day, secular politics.”19
r
Category: History

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
icon
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

Machiavelli's View of Human Nature Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia

In The Prince Niccolo Machiavelli presents a view of governing a state that is
drastically different from that of humanists of his time. Machiavelli believes
the ruling Prince should be the sole authority determining every aspect of the
state and put in effect a policy which would serve his best interests. These
interests were gaining, maintaining, and expanding his political power.1 His
understanding of human nature was a complete contradiction of what humanists
believed an

2018-12-27 03:17:54
Machiavelli's View of Human Nature Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews