The colors on his pallet for this particular work are yellow, blue-violet, and violet. Yellow and violet are complimentary colors; the blue-violet tones used were done by mixing the primary color blue and the secondary color violet to create the tertiary color blue-violet. This selection of color makes for a nice composition that gives the work a sense of harmony. This leads me to believe that his colors were well thought out when being chosen, The first application of ink was done in black. This part of the print only captures the dark shadows to the figure, leaving the rest to the composition o be filled in with color.Order now
By doing this, Warhol created the illusion of light and shadow. When the colors were added, Warhol chose blue-violet for the face of Mao, Yellow for his button up shirt, and violet for the background. The placement of these colors could be interpreted in a number of ways am sure. According to The Biography Channel Website, Mao TTS-Tune “left a controversial legacy in both China and the West as a genocidal monster and political genius’ (The Biography Channel) Therefore, being that Warhol chose to use the blue-violet on the face of Mao, it gives a cold impression much like the character of Mao himself.
Warhol took his image Of Mao from the cover Of the Quotations from Chairman Mao TTS-Tune, produced in millions of copies. He created multiple versions Of Mao screen printed onto canvas Of various sizes, Which became increasingly painterly. This gesturer quality was also evident in the 1972 print version of ten works that feature handrail marks around the head of Mao and unevenly inked colors. (National Gallery of Australia) As said previously, this is a simple forward facing portrait of Mao from the shoulders up. Although the position Of the figure is not uncommon, the chosen colors and the expression on Mayo’s face are.
The slight mischievous squint in the eyes Of the leader depicts a sense of arrogance. It is almost threatening. He has a smile which resembles more of a smirk. The combination of the two sends a message Which to me says, “Don’t even think about it, I’ll kill you. ” This portrait portrays Mao TTS-Tune, the communist Chinese leader known for his violence. Warhol was able to convey the characteristics of Mao through his use of color and composition. As an outside viewer of his work, this piece tells a story off sadistic but infamous leader. The National Gallery of Australia (NAG) tells us how Mr.. Warhol came upon his subject matter.
Always keen for new subject matter, developments in American foreign policy presented Warhol with a new celebrity. In 1972 President Nixon made his first official trip to China ? a country that had been unrecognized by many in the West ever since the Communist Revolution of 1949. There Nixon met the Chinese Communist leader, Chairman Mao Sedona, heralding a new era of diplomacy. This event and the figure of Mao provided a new icon for the artist – someone who was recognizable to millions, and therefore a sure money spinner This was a serious consideration for an artist always keen to become richer. National Gallery of Australia) It was stated in a Youth video documentary created by Matthew Cowlings that, N/roll was interested in glamour and the magic about being a star. ” (Matthew Cowlings) Therefore, Mayo’s power as a political leader and the degree of violence that he portrayed worked as motivators for him to be used in the work of Andy Warhol. The second piece of work that am going to discuss is Candy Apple Chick II by James Gill. This piece consists of a portrait of a woman looking up, repeated three times along the top 1/3 of the canvas.
She is surrounded by a flat but loud orange, trimmed in a rich blue. The remaining 2/3 of the canvas is the lower half of a woman from her shoulders down, stepping out of a car. This portion of the image is sectioned off in the shape off rectangle, and flooded with a blue-green. It is surrounded by the same orange as the portraits above it, All of the subject matter was done in graphite pencil. Artist: James Francis Gill Title: Candy Apple Chick II, 1966 Size: 60′ ex.” Medium: Graphite and lacquer on canvas The colors chosen for this creation are orange, blue, and blue-green. All of the colors are flat and saturated.
Orange was used as both the picture border, and he background for the triple portrait, The triple portrait is of a woman smiling as she looks up toward the sky. The orange chosen to surround her gives a sense of light or luminosity. It creates a Blowing and happy feeling. The blue used to trim the portraits of the female pushes her poniard. It helps to draw your attention to her _ As the orange carries down the left and right borders Of the canvas, your eye flows down to the lower portion of the canvas drawing you in to the blue- green image Of the woman stepping out Of the car _ The much darker blue-green brings the feeling and emotion down.
The blue and orange are complimentary to en another, and blue-green is a tertiary color. These pigments agree With one another. The way that they are placed on the canvas makes it easy for the eye to travel. The arrangement on the canvas begins at the top and works its way to the bottom. Much like the choice in color, the arrangement also assists in helping the eye to travel across the entire work of art. When James Francis Gill was first recognized in 1962 at The Felix Landau Gallery in L. A. , he did so by walking into the gallery unannounced with a series of paintings under his arm titled “Women in Cars”. Galleries Michael) In these earlier arks, Gill illustrated upper class women who always wore their sunglasses stepping out of their cars. It bewildered him that you could never see their eyes; therefore, he chose to do a series about it. Names Gill Full Circle) Candy Apple Chick II I believe is accompanied by this earlier idea fossil’s, although the triple portrait of the woman does not have on sunglasses. This to me represents some sort of awakening. It almost says to me, “l don’t have to hide; now I can see the light. In a very seductive manner, the woman’s leg is stepping out of the car. She wears a black stiletto, and you can see where the top of her panty hose ends If you were to put sunglasses on this woman, it would seem that she was hiding a secret Or maybe just wanted to appear mysterious. Then instead Of a woman’s face vivid eyes shielded by sunglass, we have a beautiful, bright, beaming Avon With her eyes Wide open and smiling from ear to ear. Prom looking at the earlier works of James Gill and the work I have chosen to discuss, feel as though he added a sense Of freedom to this work.
He gave eyes to the women stepping out of their cars. Now that I Have discussed each work of art in detail, I would like to talk about how they are similar. Both Andy Warhol and James Gill were iconic artists during the Pop Art Movement. The term Pop-Art was invented by British curator Lawrence Allow in 1 955, to describe a new form of “Popular” art – a movement characterized by the imagery to consumerism and popular culture. Pop-Art emerged in both New York and London during the mid-shoos and became the dominant avian-garden style until the late sass.
Characterized by bold, simple, everyday imagery, and vibrant block colors, it was interesting to look at and had a modern “hip” feel, The bright color schemes also enabled this form of vaunt-garden art to emphasize certain elements in contemporary culture, and helped to narrow the divide between the commercial arts and the fine arts. (Pop Art) When looking at the works of these two brilliant artists, I feel as though I am looking at the definition of Pop Art as just shared it with you. Both artists utilized bright color schemes in large blocks Of color.
They each took simple everyday subject matter and transformed it into something that was exciting and pleasing to the eye. As you may have noticed, both artists chose complimentary color schemes in their works, showing their knowledge of the use of color. They also used their color choices to convey certain feelings and emotions. For example, Warhol used the blue-violet on the face of Mao, where, Gill used the blue-green on the lower body of his subject matter. Though they are different feelings, they each produce a feeling that is beneath excitement or happiness.
Horizontally. Com defines Pop Art as, a form of art that depicts objects or scenes from everyday life and employs techniques of commercial art and popular illustration. Andy Whorl’s Mao TTS-Tune portrait is off well known leader that was common to the everyday media. It was an easily recognizable image. Warhol took that image and commercialism it. He transformed what would have been a dull photo into a work of art that was eye catching, As for Gill, he took 2 different everyday images. One image was off woman smiling and another of a woman stepping out of a car.
He combined the two into an illustration. His art work as well as Whorl’s was meant to be discussed, interpreted, and corroborated. Subsequently, Warhol and Gill shared a lot peculiarities in their works. They both utilized the vibrant colors, everyday images and scenes and techniques of illustrative and commercial art. These two artists produced works during the same art movement. Both artists were included in the world-famous SAA Paulo g exhibit in Brazil, Which established the hierarchy of the Pop Art icons. The two were in the same places at the same time.
Or were they? Though they have many similarities, they are also packed full Of differences. Let me begin by kicking around their subject matter. Andy Warhol was very well known for his portraits Of the celebrities Of his time. He made it a point to keep up With the world, so much that as stated in Matthew Cowlings documentary, Malarial made a new self to fit the new world. In contrast, Garners Gill painted images of current events, everyday scenes, and even Marilyn Monroe (which preceded Whorl’s Marilyn Monroe). However, Gill was much more painterly in style. He dealt with his subjects in a manner that was too emotionally loaded for him to be considered just a Pop artist” Los Angles Times Editor Henry J. Selves. Gill himself stated in a documentary, “none of the rich and famous people were ever happy,” Consequently, in 1972 at the peak of his tame, Gill went into a self-imposed exile in California to improve his artistic form’ and expression without material trappings. That being said, it shows the different mind sets of these two artists and why they produced such different works. Warhol was gunning for the fame and fortune, and Gill was trying to get away from it.
Warhol changed himself to please the media, while Gill chose to flee in order to find himself again, Let’s now consider the different materials and mediums chosen by each artist. Andy Warhol was associated faith screen printing, which is the process that he used on his portrait of Mao. The print was done on Becket High White Paper and consisted of 4 different colors of ink. Mr.. Warhol worked with a number of tedium but was very proficient in screen printing. At the height of his fame as a painter, Warhol had several assistants vivo produced his silk-screen multiples, following his directions to make different versions and variations. The Philosophy Of Andy Warhol) James Gill however, was not yet into the process Of screen printing. Screen printing is a technique that he later became interested in and even stated in a documentary, “man Wish I would have done that,” in reference to Whorl’s work. [James Gill Full Circle) Gill’s work consisted of drawing and painting. In the artwork being discussed, Candy Apple Chick II, he seed graphite pencil and lacquer, which are much different materials than used in Whorl’s Mao TTS-Tune. It was drawn on canvas.
The mediums chosen by Gill and Warhol each required a different level of skill and technique. The subject matter in the work of Andy Warhol leaned more towards popularity, fame, and glamour, whereas the work of James Gill involved much more emotion and feeling. Different agendas were on the minds of each artist. Though Gill wanted to pursue his artwork, he wanted to do it his way. He wanted to be happy doing it. Andy Warhol wanted the tame and fortune. He molded himself to fit the expectations of society.
So you see no artist is one in the same, and neither are their works of art To cut a long story short, though artists are capable of producing similar works of art during the same time period, doesn’t mean they were thinking the same thoughts. Just because two pieces of art look similar in nature does not mean that the same mediums were used. Granting that each artist avgas considered a Pop Artist, they each defined Pop Art in their own via’,h Every artist is unique in their own way. That is what separates them from everyone else. Andy Warhol could have added more emotion into his artwork, UT he didn’t.