We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

bill of rights Essay

bill of rights Essay

How many rights do you have? You should check, because it might not be
as many today as it was a few years ago, or even a few months ago. Some
people I talk to are not concerned that police will execute a search
warrant without knocking or that they set up roadblocks and stop and
interrogate innocent citizens. They do not regard these as great
infringements on their rights. But when you put current events together,
there is information that may be surprising to people who have not yet been
concerned: The amount of the Bill of Rights that is under attack is
alarming.

We will write a custom essay on bill of rights specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

Let’s take a look at the Bill of Rights and see which aspects are
being pushed on or threatened.

The point here is not the degree of each
attack or its rightness or wrongness, but the sheer number of rights that
are under attack.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech,
or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to
petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

ESTABLISHING RELIGION: While campaigning for his first term, George
Bush said “I don’t know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor
should they be considered patriots.” Bush has not retracted, commented on,
or clarified this statement, in spite of requests to do so. According to
Bush, this is one nation under God. And apparently if you are not within
Bush’s religious beliefs, you are not a citizen.

Federal, state, and local
governments also promote a particular religion (or, occasionally,
religions) by spending public money on religious displays.

FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION: Robert Newmeyer and Glenn Braunstein were jailed
in 1988 for refusing to stand in respect for a judge. Braunstein says the
tradition of rising in court started decades ago when judges entered
carrying Bibles. Since judges no longer carry Bibles, Braunstein says there
is no reason to stand — and his Bible tells him to honor no other God. For
this religious practice, Newmeyer and Braunstein were jailed and are now
suing.

FREE SPEECH: We find that technology has given the government an excuse to
interfere with free speech.

Claiming that radio frequencies are a limited
resource, the government tells broadcasters what to say (such as news and
public and local service programming) and what not to say (obscenity, as
defined by the Federal Communications Commission FCC). The FCC is
investigating Boston PBS station WGBH-TV for broadcasting photographs from
the Mapplethorpe exhibit.

FREE SPEECH: There are also laws to limit political statements and
contributions to political activities. In 1985, the Michigan Chamber of
Commerce wanted to take out an advertisement supporting a candidate in the
state house of representatives. But a 1976 Michigan law prohibits a
corporation from using its general treasury funds to make independent
expenditures in a political campaign. In March, the Supreme Court upheld
that law.

According to dissenting Justice Kennedy, it is now a felony in
Michigan for the Sierra Club, the American Civil Liberties Union, or the
Chamber of Commerce to advise the public how a candidate voted on issues of
urgent concern to their members.

FREE PRESS: As in speech, technology has provided another excuse for
government intrusion in the press. If you distribute a magazine
electronically and do not print copies, the government doesn’t consider you
a press and does not give you the same protections courts have extended to
printed news. The equipment used to publish Phrack, a worldwide electronic
magazine about phones and hacking, was confiscated after publishing a
document copied from a Bell South computer entitled “A Bell South Standard
Practice (BSP) 660-225-104SV Control Office Administration of Enhanced 911
Services for Special Services and Major Account Centers, March, 1988.” All
of the information in this document was publicly available from Bell South
in other documents. The government has not alleged that the publisher of
Phrack, Craig Neidorf, was involved with or participated in the copying of
the document.

READ:  The play an inspector calls is heavily built on the atmosphere of the acts and how each character fits in to the scene Essay

Also, the person who copied this document from telephone
company computers placed a copy on a bulletin board run by Rich Andrews.
Andrews forwarded a copy to AT officials and cooperated with authorities
fully. In return, the Secret Service (SS) confiscated Andrews’ computer
along with all the mail and data that were on it. Andrews was not charged
with any crime.

FREE PRESS: In another incident that would be comical if it were not true,
on March 1 the SS ransacked the offices of Steve .

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
icon
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

bill of rights Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia
bill of rights Essay How many rights do you have? You should check, because it might not be as many today as it was a few years ago, or even a few months ago. Some people I talk to are not concerned that police will execute a search warrant without knocking or that they set up roadblocks and stop and interrogate innocent citizens. They do not regard these as great infringements on their rights. But when you put current events together, there is information that may be su
2019-02-12 07:54:13
bill of rights Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews