We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

12 angry men Essay

The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the
ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve
men are locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy.
All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in
the electric chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a
grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the
boy if found guilty.

Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are
certain the boy is guilty.

However, when the initial poll is taken Juror #8
(Henry Fonda) registers a shocking not guilty vote. Immediately the room is in
uproar. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenient of his decision. After
questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror #8 (Henry Fonda)
by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour. Eventually, as the talks proceed
juror #8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is
widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect.
Gradually they are won over by his arguments and even the most narrow minded of
his fellow jurors hesitantly agrees with him.

We will write a custom essay on 12 angry men specifically for you
for only $16.38 $13.9/page

Order now

Their verdict is now a solid not
guilty.

Arriving at a unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily. The jury
encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other.
What seems to be a decisive guilty verdict as deliberations begin slowly
becomes a questionable not sure. Although the movie deals with issues relating
to the process of effective communication this paper will focus of two reasons
why they encounter difficulties and how they overcome them. First, we will apply
the Johari grid theory and see how it applies to their situation.

Then, we will
see how each individual’s frame of reference and prejudices effect their
perception which cause difficulties in the communication process.

If we analyze the Johari grid of each juror we see a large hidden area in
the case of all of the men. Take into consideration, referred to by juror
numbers only they do not even have the benefit of knowing their names. These men
have never talked before. Each of them come from different situations with
individual and unique experiences. The public area consists solely of the
shared information provided during the trial.

Their hidden area is immense
resulting in an equally large blind area. The public, hidden and blind areas are
relatively the same for each juror before beginning the deliberation. It is the
size of the unconscious area that will differ more among the men. We will see
how the contents of the unconscious area will largely effect the decision making
process of some of the jurors. Because the information contained in the
unconscious area is unrecognized it is often the most difficult to overcome.

Henry Fonda’s (Juror #8) interpersonal style would be classified as open-
receptive.

He levels with the others by openly admitting that he does not know
if the boy killed his father and solicits feedback in order to make an accurate
decision. He says I just don’t think we should send a boy off to die without
at least talking about it first. The example he set encourages the others to
level and be open to receive feedback. The movie illustrates the process of
leveling and soliciting feedback which can make all the difference. .

Choose Type of service

Choose writer quality

Page count

1 page 275 words

Deadline

Order Essay Writing

$13.9 Order Now
icon Get your custom essay sample
icon
Sara from Artscolumbia

Hi there, would you like to get such an essay? How about receiving a customized one?
Check it out goo.gl/Crty7Tt

12 angry men Essay
Artscolumbia
Artscolumbia
The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men are locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The judge informs the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilt
2019-02-12 07:22:16
12 angry men Essay
$ 13.900 2018-12-31
artscolumbia.org
In stock
Rated 5/5 based on 1 customer reviews